Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 535 UK
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2021
WPMS No.3132 of 2018 Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mahavir Kohli, Advocate for the respondent.
The challenge given by the petitioner in the present writ petition, is to the judgment of Electricity Ombudsman Uttarakhand as rendered in Representation No.16 of 2018 on 06.07.2018.
Initially, when the challenge was given to the said decision of Electricity Ombudsman, notices were issued to the respondent and the respondent had put in appearance. But till date, no counter affidavit has been filed.
When the matter was taken up today, the learned Senior Advocate Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, submits that he does not propose to file any counter affidavit, in view of the finding recorded in para 4 and 5 of the writ petition.
Hence, in view of the aforesaid, put up this writ petition on 05.03.2021 for final determination.
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 26.02.2021 Arti
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!