Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPCRL/359/2021
2021 Latest Caselaw 471 UK

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 471 UK
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2021

Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/359/2021 on 25 February, 2021
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
             AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
                                   AND
          THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA



   CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.359 OF 2021


                   25TH FEBRUARY, 2021


Between:


Nisha and another.

                                                      .......Petitioners

and

State of Uttarakhand and others.

                                                    .......Respondents

Counsel for the petitioners                :      Mr. Mehboob Rahi,
                                                  learned Advocate
                                                  holding brief of
                                                  Mr.     Abhishek
                                                  Verma.

Counsel for the respondents                :      Mr. J.S. Virk,
                                                  learned      Deputy
                                                  Advocate General
                                                  with    Mr.    Rohit
                                                  Dhyani,        Brief
                                                  Holder    for   the
                                                  State.


The Court made the following:


ORDER :   (per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)




      Issue notice to respondent nos. 3 to 5, returnable

within four weeks.
 2.         Ms. Nisha, daughter of Mr. Mohan Singh

Rana (petitioner No.1) and Mr. Arif Khan, son of Mr.

Irfan (petitioner No.2) have filed the present writ

petition, inter-alia, on the facts and grounds that in

the year 2006 petitioner No.1 was earlier married to

one Mr. Kamal. During her married life, she was

blessed with a daughter. However as differences

arose between petitioner No.1 and Mr. Kamal, they

divorced each other; the divorce judgment and decree

is dated 26.08.2019.


3.         Meanwhile, Arif Khan, the petitioner No.2

was earlier married to one Ms. Sahana. However,

unfortunately Ms. Sahana expired on 20.08.2011.

Her death certificate has also been attached with the

present    writ   petition.   Thus,   the   petitioner No.1

happens to be a divorced lady, and the petitioner

No.2 happens to be a widower.


4.         Since the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 came to

know each other, they fell in love and were living in a

live-in   relationship.   However,     subsequently   they

decided to get married under the Special Marriage

Act, 1954. Therefore on 22.01.2021, they filed an

application before the Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Vikasnagar, District Dehradun, under the said Act. As

soon as notices were issued to the relatives of


                               2
 petitioner No.1, the petitioner No.1 was and is being

subjected      to   torture       by    her    relatives,    namely

respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5. According to her, she is

being harassed in order to convince her not to

perform her marriage with petitioner No.2. Since, she

is resisting the harassment and the pressure of the

family, petitioner No.1 claims that on 19.02.2020,

some of her relatives dashed a two wheeler against

her, thereby causing injuries on her body. They

further threatened her with dire consequences, if she

were     to    perform      the    proposed       marriage      with

petitioner No.2. In order to establish the plea,

petitioner no.1 has submitted the medical report and

the complaint submitted by her through e-mail with

the    present      writ    petition.     Therefore      both   the

petitioners have sought Police protection from this

Court.


5.            Needless to say, it is the constitutional duty

of the State to protect the life of its people. Since

both petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are major, they are free

to marry each other, even if, there is a protest by the

family   members.          Obviously     the    family      members

cannot be permitted to take the law in their own

hands and to threaten, the petitioners.




                                   3
 6.               In catena of cases, the Hon'ble Supreme

Court has clearly observed that marriage falls within

the right of privacy and right to human dignity.

Therefore,         respondent   nos.    3   to    5   cannot   be

permitted either to invade the right of privacy, or to

encroach upon the right to dignity. Hence, respondent

nos. 3 to 5 are not justified in imposing their will upon

petitioner Nos.1 and 2.


7.               Since, the petitioners do apprehend, threat

to their life and property, the Station House Officer,

Police         Station   Vikasnagar,   District   Dehradun     is

directed to immediately provide Police protection to

the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, during the pendency of

this writ petition.



                    _____________________________
                    RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.



                                     ___________________
                                     ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.

Dt:25th February, 2021 Neha/Shubham

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter