Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The General Manager (Project) vs Sri Swapan Chandra Dey
2024 Latest Caselaw 852 Tri

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 852 Tri
Judgement Date : 24 May, 2024

Tripura High Court

The General Manager (Project) vs Sri Swapan Chandra Dey on 24 May, 2024

                             HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                                   AGARTALA

                 L.A. App. No.39 of 2023

     The General Manager (Project)
     National Highways Infrastructural Development
     Corporation Ltd, (NHIDCL) Ministry of Road,
     Transport & Highways, a Government of India
     Undertakings, PMU Office-Khowai, P.S. Khowai,
     District- Khowai, Tripura, PIN-799201
                                                                 ...... Appellant(s)

                                     Versus
1.   Sri Swapan Chandra Dey
     son of late Jatish Dey of Uttar Champamura,
     P.O. Bodhjungnagar, District- West Tripura

2.   The L.A. Collector
     West Tripura, Agartala, P.S. West Agartala,
     District- West Tripura

                                                            ...... Respondent(s)

     For the Appellant(s)               :   Mr. S. Ghosh, Adv.
     For the Respondent(s)              :   Mr. U.K. Majumder, Adv.
                                            Mr. T.K. Choudhury, Adv.

     Date of hearing & delivery of      :   24.05.2024
     Judgment & order
                                             YES   NO
     Whether fit for reporting          :          √




                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA

                                 JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL)

Heard Mr. S. Ghosh, learned counsel appearing for the

appellant as well as Mr. U.K. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for

the claimant-respondent No.1 and Mr. T.K. Choudhury, learned counsel

appearing for the L.A. Collector-respondent No.2.

[2] This appeal arises out of the award dated 10.08.2022 passed

in Misc. L.A. 49 of 2017 by learned L.A Judge, Court No.4, West Tripura,

Agartala.

[3] An area of 0.06 acres of Class-Bastu (Tilla) of Plot

No.7281(P) of Khatian No. 2235 of Mouja-North Champamura, sheet

No.3(P) was acquired by the government vide Notification No.9(44)-

REV/ACQ/VI/2000 dated 22.03.3022 for the purpose of construction of

Bye-pass road from Khayerpur to Amtali under Sadar Sub-Division. The

L.A. Collector awarded compensation at flat rate of Rs.25,000/- [Rupees

Twenty Five thousand] per kani for all classes of land and being

aggrieved thereby, the claimants sought for reference before the L.A.

Judge and accordingly, the matter was so referred.

[4] Learned L.A. Judge vide impugned award determined the

compensation @ Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight lakh) per kani and also

awarded other statutory reliefs, namely solatium, additional

compensation, interest etc. Being aggrieved thereby, this appeal has

been preferred by the requiring department.

[5] During hearing, all the learned counsel submit that

concerning the same acquisition of lands of said Mouja-North

Champamura, learned L.A. Judge passed different awards against which

several appeals were preferred by the requiring department in this

Court which were dismissed by affirming the award of the L.A. Judge

and therefore, in similar line necessary order may be passed in this

appeal. They have also referred a decision of this Court passed in the

General Manager (Project) vs. Sri Sunil Ch. Dey and another,

[judgment and order dated 09.04.2024 in L.A. App. No. 35 of 2023] and

5[five] other connected L.A appeals.

[6]          Considered the submissions.





       [7]           From the above judgment passed in L.A. App. No.35 of 2023,

it appears that earlier also in L.A. App. No.14 of 2023, L.A. App. No.43

of 2023 and L.A. App. No.44 of 2023 and in some other appeals, similar

view was taken by this Court affirming the judgment of the L.A Judge. It

was also submitted by the learned counsel of the appellants in those

cases that the awards passed by the learned L.A Judge and as affirmed

by this Court were already complied with by the appellant. In L.A. App.

No.35 of 2023 also award passed by learned L.A. Judge was affirmed

maintaining compensation @ Rs.8,00,000/- per kani.

[8] In view of the above submissions of the learned counsel and

also in view of the judgments passed by this Court in other similar

appeals as indicated above, it is held that the present appeal is being

devoid of any merit and accordingly, the same is dismissed and the

impugned award passed by the L.A. Judge, Court No.4, West Tripura,

Agartala is hereby affirmed.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

Send down the LCRs with a copy of this order.

JUDGE

SUJAY GHOSH Digitally signed by SUJAY GHOSH Date: 2024.05.24 17:38:03 +05'30'

Sujay

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter