Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 344 Tri
Judgement Date : 27 April, 2023
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
W.A. No.10/2023
Sri Sukradhan Chakma & others
.........Appellant(s).
VERSUS
The State of Tripura & others
.........Respondent(s).
For Appellant(s) : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate, Ms. A. Debbarma, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Debalay Bhattacharya, G.A., Mr. Soumyadeep Saha, Advocate.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
Order 27/04/2023
Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. A.
Debbarma, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners'
case was under active consideration when the scheme for regularization was
suddenly repealed/abolished in 2018. This has amounted to defeating the
legitimate right and expectations of the writ petitioners who have been
engaged for more than 20(twenty) years by now and are still being continued
as daily rated workers. This defeats the very intent of the judgment in the
case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others vrs. Umadevi (3) reported
in (2006) 4 SCC 1 and in the case of Narendra Kumar Tiwari and others
vrs. State of Jharkhand and others reported in (2018) 8 SCC 238.
Mr. Debalay Bhattacharya, learned Government Advocate
assisted by Mr. Soumyadeep Saha, learned counsel for the respondents-
State, seeks some time to obtain fresh instructions.
As prayer for, list the case on 11.05.2023.
(T. AMARNATH GOUD), J (APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ
Pulak
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!