Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 392 Tri
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2021
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
WP(C) 195 of 2021
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T. K. Deb, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. K. De, Addl. GA.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
Order
22.03.2021
Heard Mr. T. K. Deb, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner.
Issue notice calling upon the respondents to show cause as
to why a Rule should not be issued as prayed for; and/or any other
such further order(s) shall not be passed as to this Court may deem fit
and proper having regard to the circumstances of the case.
Notice is made returnable on 12.04.2021.
Since Mr. K. De, learned Addl. G. A. appears and waives the
notice for the respondents No.1 to 4 and hence no formal steps for
service needs to be taken in respect of those respondents. However,
steps for service of notice on the respondents No. 5 to 9 shall be taken
by the petitioner within a week from today by registered post with AD.
As serious allegations have been leveled against the
respondents No. 2 and 4 in respect of implementation of the judgment
and order dated 10.02.2020 delivered in WP(C) 225 of 2018, the
respondents shall, in their reply, elaborately state why the said direction
contained in the judgment and order dated 10.02.2020 was not
implemented, if not implemented by them.
It is made absolutely clear that if it is found that the said
direction was not properly implemented, a suo-moto cognizance for
violating the direction dated 10.02.2020 will be taken by this court.
A copy of this order be supplied to the Mr. K. De, learned
Addl. GA appearing for the respondents.
JUDGE
Dipak
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!