Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr. S. Lodh vs Mr. R. Datta
2021 Latest Caselaw 587 Tri

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 587 Tri
Judgement Date : 4 June, 2021

Tripura High Court
Mr. S. Lodh vs Mr. R. Datta on 4 June, 2021
                             HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                                   AGARTALA

                                A.B No. 29 of 2021

For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. S. Lodh, Adv.

For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. R. Datta, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. CHATTOPADHYAY

Order

04/06/2021

[1] This is an application filed under section 438 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C hereunder) for granting pre

arrest bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest in West Agartala

Women P.S case No. 2021WAW26 dated 21.03.2021 registered under

sections 498A, 323, 506 and 34 IPC.

[2] Heard Mr. S. Lodh, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner as well as Mr. R. Datta, learned P.P representing the State

respondent.

[3] The factual background of the case is as under:

Petitioner is the husband of the complainant Smt. Dipali

Debnath who lodged a written FIR with the Officer in Charge of West

Agartala Women police station on 05.03.021 alleging, inter alia, that she

was married to the petitioner on 17.04.2019 in accordance with the

Sastric rites of Hindu Marriage. After marriage she accompanied her

husband to his place and lived together in happiness for about 3 (three)

months. Thereafter her petitioner husband started committing physical

and mental torture on her. In the course of time, she discovered that her

petitioner husband had maintained physical relationship with his sister in

law. When she raised voice against the conduct of her husband she was

beaten by him. At that time she was carrying 4 months pregnancy.

Having been tortured by her petitioner husband he left for her

matrimonial home where she delivered a daughter. Even the hospital bills

for her delivery were also paid by her parents. The petitioner refused to

pay any bill to the hospital. 2/3 months prior to filing FIR, the petitioner

met his complainant wife in his in laws' house and abused her with filthy

words and threatened her that he would kill her and her daughter.

[4] Based on her said FIR, the present case was registered.

[5] Anticipating arrest in this case the petitioner has

approached this court seeking pre arrest bail.

[6] It is submitted by Mr. Lodh, learned counsel that the

complainant has brought false allegations against her husband with a

view to harass him. It is submitted by learned counsel that she left her

husband voluntarily for which her husband also instituted a proceeding

under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act in the Family Court at

Agartala which was registered as TS (RCR) 2 of 2021 for restitution of

conjugal rights. The case was heard on merit and the learned Family

Court by judgment and order dated 05.04.2021 allowed the petition for

restitution of conjugal rights and directed the complainant wife to

resume her conjugal life with the petitioner. According to Mr. Lodh,

learned counsel the complainant wife of the petitioner lodged the FIR

on false and frivolous allegations with a view to harass her husband

and defend the proceeding in the Family Court. Learned counsel,

therefore, urges the court to consider these aspects and allow bail to

the accused.

[7] Heard Mr. R. Datta, learned P.P who submits that

allegations against the petitioner are serious and therefore he does not

deserve anticipatory bail.

[8] Considered the submissions made by learned counsel

representing the parties. Perused the case diary as well as the

materials placed before this court.

[9] In view of the nature of the dispute and the facts and

circumstances presented before this court, I am of the view that

custodial interrogation of the accused is not necessary in the given

case. Therefore, in the event of arrest the accused petitioner may go on

bail on his furnishing a bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of like

amount to the satisfaction of the investigating officer on the following

conditions:

(i) That he will appear before the investigating officer as

and when called for.

(ii) He will not leave the state without prior permission of

the investigating officer.

[10] In terms of the above, the bail petition stands

allowed and disposed of. Return the case diary to Mr. R. Datta, learned

P.P.

JUDGE

Rudradeep

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter