Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 736 Tri
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2021
Page 1 of 1
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
Cont. Cas (C) No.46/2021
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aradhita Debbarma, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : None.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. CHATTOPADHYAY
ORDER
19/07/2021.
(Akil Kureshi, CJ).
Learned counsel, Ms. Aradhita Debbarma submitted that the
respondents have not complied with the directions contained in the
judgment dated 02.02.2021 in W.P. (C) No.291 of 2020 within the time
permitted.
We notice that there are large number of respondents in this petition.
However, for the present, we do not find it necessary to issue notice to all
of them. It would prima facie appear that the respondents No.2 and 3 had
the primary duty to carry out the directions contained in the said judgment.
Let the notice be issued to respondents No.2 and 3 only, returnable
for 16.08.2021.
(S.G. CHATTOPADHYAY), J (AKIL KURESHI), CJ
sima
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!