Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1301 Tri
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2021
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
IA No.03 of 2021 in MAC App. No. 140 of 2013(D.O)
Bijit Das and another
............... Applicant(s).
Vs.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
............... Respondent(s).
For Applicant(s) : Mr. Samar Das, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gan Chaudhury, Advocate.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Order
22/12/2021
The petitioners have filed amended copy of the petition
incorporating the name of Smt. Manti Debnath (Das) and Sri Surajit Das
(minor) in terms of the order dated 12.11.2021 passed in IA No.4 of
2021. The petitioners have claimed disbursement of the share of
compensation awarded to Late Bimalendu Das in MAC App. No.140 of
2013.
[2] Petitioners namely, Sri Bijit Das and Sri Arijit Das filed
TS(MAC) 85 of 2011 before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Court No.2),
Agartala along with their father namely, Bimalendu Das seeking
compensation owing to the death of their mother Smt. Ratna Das in a
road traffic accident. The Tribunal passed an award on 01.07.2013 in their
favour. A sum of Rs.10,81,464 along with 9% annual interest thereon was
awarded by the Tribunal in favour of the claimants.
[3] The insurance company filed an appeal against the said award
before this court which was registered as MAC App. 140 of 2013, by
judgment and order dated 28.07.2016 the said MAC Appeal was
dismissed by this court observing as under:
"In my opinion, the aforesaid findings and assessment made by the Tribunal do not suffer from any illegality, and are, as a matter of fact, consistent with the decision of the Apex Court Arun Kumar Agarwal (supra). The impugned award, therefore, does not suffer from any illegality or arbitrariness calling for the interference of this Court.
Resultantly, this appeal has no merit and is accordingly dismissed."
[4] During the pendency of the appeal, the insurance company
deposited the awarded sum of compensation. After the compensation was
deposited by the insurance company, the original claimants filed a petition
before this Court on 01.12.2014 seeking reimbursement of the
compensation in their favour. Said petition was registered as CM
Application 604 of 2014 in MAC Appeal No.140 of 2013. By an order dated
08.01.2015, said CM application No.604 of 2014 was disposed of by this
Court observing as under:
"The learned MACT passed an award of Rs.10,56,464/- in favour of the claimants. This amount is payable to the claimants in equal shares.
The appeal is still pending. Therefore, it is directed that a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh) each shall be paid to each of the claimants by remitting it to their personal Bank accounts details whereof along with photocopies of the first page of the passbook be submitted in the Registry of this Court within 2(two) weeks from today. Remaining amount shall be kept in a fixed deposit for a period of 5 years.
The application is accordingly disposed of."
Accordingly, sum of Rs.1,00,000/- was released in favour of
each of the petitioners in terms of order dated 08.01.2014.
[5] As the remaining amount of compensation was invested in
bank in a term deposit for a period of 5 years in the name of the original
claimants, they could not withdraw the money at that time. However, on
expiry of 5 years, among the 03 original claimants, 02 claimants namely
Bijit Das and his full blooded brother Arijit Das had withdrawn their share
of the compensation after the term deposits were matured. Their father
namely Bimalendu Das who was also a claimant with them in the original
claim petition, died on 12.09.2017 before his share of the compensation
was disbursed in his favour. Therefore, original claimants namely Bijit Das
and Arijit Das who are full blooded brothers filed a petition before this
Court on 22.09.2021 seeking disbursal of his father's share of the
compensation in their favour. In support of their claim they also filed the
death certificate of their father issued by the Birth and Death Registrar of
Kanchannagar Gram Panchayat of Bokafa RD Block, Santirbazar
[Annexure-4] and the Survival certificate issued by the Sub-divisional
Judicial Magistrate (SDM). It was stated in paragraph 6 of the said
petition that after the death of their mother in accident, their father
contracted a second marriage and a son was born within the said wed-
lock of their father.
[6] Now, the surviving wife of Bimalendu Das and their son
namely, Surajit Das have been impleaded in the petition by way of
amendment. They are also entitled to equal share of the sum of
compensation left by late Bimalendu Das.
[7] Mr. Saugat Datta, learned counsel is representing the newly
added petitioners namely, Smt. Manti Debnath(Das) and her son Sri
Surajit Das. I have heard Mr. Datta on the matter. Also heard Mr. Samar
Das, learned advocate appearing for petitioners namely, Sri Bijit Das and
Sri Arijit Das.
[8] In view of the above, Registry is directed to disburse the
share of Bimalendu Das in equal share to the four claimants namely, Sri
Bijit Das, Sri Arijit Das, Smt. Manti Debnath(Das) and her minor son Sri
Surajit Das. The share of the minor son namely, Sri Surajit Das shall be
invested in a term deposit for a period till he attains the age of majority.
The share of other three petitioners shall be disbursed by transferring the
amount to their individual bank account on verification of their identity
within 7th January, 2022. They shall furnish their bank details to the
Registry immediately.
[9] In terms of the above, the I. A is disposed of.
JUDGE
Dipankar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!