Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri.Maddula Karthik Kumar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana
2025 Latest Caselaw 5566 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5566 Tel
Judgement Date : 18 September, 2025

Telangana High Court

Sri.Maddula Karthik Kumar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana on 18 September, 2025

     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

                     WRIT PETITION No.27078 of 2025

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and G.Aniketh Reddy,

learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent

Nos.1 to 4. With their consent this writ petition is taken up for disposal.

2. This writ petition is filed seeking following prayer:-

"to declare the inaction of the respondent No.4 in providing police protection to the petitioners land admeasuring Ac.00.09 Gts in Sy No.198, situated at Mankal Revenue Village, under Thukkuguda Gram Panchayat, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and bounded by North: Road leading through Thukkuguda to Basarguda, South: Agricultural land in Survey No.40, East:

Agricultural land in survey No.317 of Anjaiah Goud and West: Agricultural lands in survey No.197 from the respondent No.5 and his henchmen having acknowledging the complaint dated 11.08.2025 from the petitioners and also despite Perpetual injunction operating against the respondent No.5 and others in OS No.1359 of 2018 vide judgment and Decree dated 30.11.2018 passed by IX Additional Senior Civil Judge, L.B Nagar, R.R District, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Art. 14, 21, 300-A of Constitution of India contrary to various judgments of Honourable Apex Court as well as this Honourable Court and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to extend police protection to the petitioners land admeasuring Ac.00. 09 Gts in Sy No.198, situated at Mankal Revenue Village, under Thukkuguda Gram Panchayat, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and bounded by North: Road leading through Thukkuguda to Basarguda, South: Agricultural land in Survey No.40, East: Agricultural land in survey No.317 of Anjaiah Goud and West: Agricultural lands in survey No.197 from the respondent No.5 and his henchmen."

3. Brief facts stated in this writ petition are that petitioners claims that

their father had purchased land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.00.09 Gts in

Sy.No.198, situated at Mankal Revenue Village, under Thukkuguda Gram

Panchayat, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, through registered

sale deed bearing document No.951 of 2013 dated 27.02.2013. Later, on

17.07.2018, respondent No.5 trespassed the subject land and tried to dispossess

the petitioners' father. Hence, petitioners' father filed suit for perpetual

injunction i.e., O.S.No.1359 of 2018 and the learned IX Additional Senior Civil

Judge, R.R.District, L.B.Nagar, vide order dated 30.11.2018, granted perpetual

injunction and restrained respondent No.5 and their henchmen from entering

into the subject land. It is further submitted the petitioners' father died on

16.01.2024 and petitioners being the legal heir have succeeded to the subject

property and were in peaceful possession of the subject property. The case of

the petitioners is that inspite of the order dated 30.11.2018 in O.S.No.1359 of

2018, respondent No.5 and his henchmen, in the second week of July, 2025 and

first week of August, 2025, criminally trespassed into the subject land and

tried to level the land with the help of JCB. Hence, the petitioners on

11.08.2025 sent a complaint through registered post and requested respondent

authorities to provide police protection to the petitioner and take action

against respondent No.5. However, till date respondent authorities had

neither provided police protection nor had initiated any action against

respondent No.5. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for

respondents Nos.1 to 4 placed on record instructions issued by Sub Inspector of

Police, Pahadishreef Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, wherein it is

submitted that the respondent No.4 did not receive any specific order from any

competent Court to provide police protection to the petitioner. It is further stated

that on petitioners' complaint dated 11.08.2025, GD entry was made and during

the course of enquiry, it was revealed that the matter pertains to civil in nature,

hence, the petitioners were suggested to approach competent civil Court for

redressal of their grievance. Thereafter, petitioners' complaint dated 11.08.2025

was closed as "Civil in Nature" and the same was intimated to the petitioners

through notice dated 09.09.2025.

5. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn attention of

this Court to the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

P.R.Murlidharan and others Vs. Swami Dharmananda Theertha Padar and

others 1 relevant paragraph is extracted hereunder:-

"A writ for "police protection" so-called, has only a limited scope, as, when the court is approached for protection of rights declared by a decree or by an order passed by a civil court. It cannot be extended to cases where rights have not been determined either finally by the civil court or, at least at an interlocutory stage in an unambiguous manner, and then too in furtherance of the decree or order."

6. Relying on the above, learned counsel for the petitioners pray this

Court to grant liberty to the petitioners to make fresh application before the

respondent authorities and pray this Court to direct the respondent authorities

to consider the same and pass orders.

7. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on

either side and in terms of order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

P.R.Murlidharan and others Vs. Swami Dharmananda Theertha Padar and

others (cited supra), this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to

petitioners to make a fresh application before respondent authorities, within a

(2006) 4 Supreme Court Cases 501

period of one (01) week from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on such

representation, the respondent authorities are directed to take further action

strictly in accordance with law.

8. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous

applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

_________________________________ JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

Date: 18.09.2025 SU

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter