Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kengarla Krishna, vs Kammari Kishtaiah,
2025 Latest Caselaw 6480 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6480 Tel
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2025

Telangana High Court

Kengarla Krishna, vs Kammari Kishtaiah, on 13 November, 2025

   THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
                                            AND
        THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR

                      C.M.A.Nos. 426 & 428 OF 2025

Mr. N. Indrasena Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant.

Mr. Palle Sriharinath, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.



COMMON JUDGMENT:

(Per Hon'ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)

Both these appeals arise out of an order passed by the

learned Principal District Judge, Kamareddy, on 06.08.2025 in

I.A.No.402 of 2025 and I.A.No.322 of 2025 in O.S.No.6 of 2025,

respectively, filed by the respondent No.1/plaintiff. I.A.No.402

of 2025 is filed for granting of ad interim injunction against the

appellant/defendant No.4 restraining the respondent

No.1/plaintiff, family members, servants and their men from

making any further construction and changing the nature of the

petition schedule property and I.A.No.322 of 2025 is filed for

granting ad-interim injunction order against the

appellant/defendant No.4 from alienating petition schedule

property to any other third party/parties by way of sale, gift,

mortgage or will and charge.

MB,J & GPK,J CMA.Nos.426 and 428 of 2025

2. The defendant No.4 is an appellant before us. The

appellant is aggrieved by the order of restraint passed against

the appellant/defendant No.4 by the learned Trial Court.

3. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the

appellant as well as learned counsel appearing for the

respondents.

4. The Court is informed that the impugned orders were

passed in both the I.As. filed by the respondent No.1/plaintiff in

O.S.No.6 of 2025. The appellant/defendant No.4 in O.S.No.6 of

2025 also filed subsequent suit-O.S.No.98 of 2025. The

respondent No.1/plaintiff was made as party in the subsequent

suit (O.S.No.98 of 2025) which was filed for perpetual injunction

against the respondent No.1 before us.

5. The respondent No.1/plaintiff's main grievance is that the

appellant/defendant No.4 (in O.S.No.6 of 2025) may create third

party interest, if the appellant/defendant No.4 is permitted to

continue construction work in the suit schedule land in

O.S.No.6 of 2025. We may deem it fit to record the submissions

made on behalf of the appellant that the appellant/defendant

No.4 will not change the nature and character of the suit

schedule property (in O.S.No.6 of 2025) and shall also not claim

MB,J & GPK,J CMA.Nos.426 and 428 of 2025

any equities in the event the respondent No.1/plaintiff succeeds

in O.S.No.6 of 2025.

6. We also deem it fit to record that the respondent

No.1/plaintiff in O.S.No.6 of 2025 has also been made as party

in the appellant's suit in O.S.No.98 of 2025 and can avail of an

adequate and effective alternative remedy in the second suit, if

the respondent No.1 is so advised. In both the suits, the first

suit is at the stage of framing of issues and in the second suit,

the notice has been issued. Hence, the parties shall get liberty

for pursuing their legal remedies in these two suits which are

pending before the learned Trial Court.

7. The appellant/defendant No.4 undertakes not to change

the suit schedule property in favour of third parties nor to claim

any equities if the respondent No.1/plaintiff succeed in

O.S.No.6 of 2025. It is also further added that the appellant

shall not claim any equities arising from construction activities

which the appellant pursues in the suit schedule property in

O.S.No.6 of 2025.

8. C.M.A.Nos.426 and 428 of 2025 are accordingly disposed

of on the basis of the submissions made on behalf of the

MB,J & GPK,J CMA.Nos.426 and 428 of 2025

appellant which we may be treated as an undertaking on behalf

of the appellant that the appellant/defendant No.4 not to

change the nature and character of the suit schedule property

in O.S.No.6 of 2025 and not to claim any equities and that the

constructions will be demolished, in the event, the respondent

No.1/plaintiff succeeds in O.S.No.6 of 2025. All connected

applications are also disposed of. There shall be no order as to

costs.

__________________________________ MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J

_____________________________ GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, J

DATE: 13.11.2025 KVR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter