Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohd. Qaiser vs Dr.Farhana Ghalib Alias Farhana Zaman
2025 Latest Caselaw 123 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 123 Tel
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2025

Telangana High Court

Mohd. Qaiser vs Dr.Farhana Ghalib Alias Farhana Zaman on 14 May, 2025

     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA


                    I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025
                            In/And
              CRIMINAL PETITION No.6256 of 2025


COMMON ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the

proceedings against the petitioners in Crime No.152 of 2025 of

Chaderghat Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences

punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338 and 340(2) of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing on both sides and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the record.

3. During the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the

parties have compromised the matter and, accordingly, respondent

No.2 filed I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 to permit to compound the

offences and to compromise the case.

4. Vide order dated 01.05.2025, this Court, after recording the

submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as

well as respondent No.2, directed the parties to appear before the

Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee,

Hyderabad, for their identification and also directed the Secretary

to submit a report by 12.05.2025. In compliance with the said

order, the Secretary has submitted his report, on 12.05.2025.

5. In the report of the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal

Services Committee, Hyderabad, it is stated that in obedience of

the orders dated 01.05.2025, the petitioners and the respondent

No.2 have appeared before him along with their counsel and on

examination and verification of their particulars from their Aadhar

Cards, they were tallied. Thus the identification of both the parties

has been established.

6. The parties herein have filed a joint memo of compromise

stating that they have settled the disputes between them amicably

and respondent No.2 has no objection to quash the proceedings

against the petitioner herein in the above Case. The said joint

memo of compromise and the report of the Secretary are placed on

record.

7. Further, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on

the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in K. Bharathi Devi

and Anr v. State of Telangana and Anr 1, wherein in paragraph

Nos.19 and 20, it is held as follows:

"19. This Court found that though the offence punishable under Section 420 of the IPC was compoundable under sub-section (2) of Section 320 CrPC with the leave of the Court, the offence of forgery was not included as one of the compoundable offences. However, the Court found that in such cases the principle enunciated in the case of B.S. Joshi and others v. State of Haryana and another8 should be applied.

20. This Court specifically noted that though it is alleged that certain documents had been created by the appellant therein to avail of credit facilities beyond the limit to which the Company was entitled, the power of quashing could be exercised. This Court found that in view of a compromise arrived at between the Company and the Bank, it was a fit case where a technicality should not be allowed to stand in the way of quashing of the criminal proceedings. This Court found that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, continuance of the same would be an exercise in futility."

8. In view the said report of the Secretary, Telangana High

Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, in view of the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in K. Bharathi Devi (supra)

and also in view of the compromise entered into between the

2024 INSC 750

petitioner and respondent No.2, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are

allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the

proceedings in Crime No.152 of 2025 of Chaderghat Police Station,

Hyderabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioner/accused.

Petitioner undertake to pay an amount of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees

Twenty Thousand Only) to The Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad

(Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of India, Shantinagar

Branch (20070), IFSC Code :SBIN0020070, MICR No.500004057),

within a period of ten days from today, and file proof of the same

into the Registry.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall

stand closed.

_________________________________ NANDIKONDA NARSING RAO, J Date: 14.05.2025

SAI/SKJ

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter