Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4185 Tel
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2025
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO
NANDIKONDA
TREVC No.50 OF 2009
JUDGMENT:
(Per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Mr. Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Standing
Counsel for the State Tax for the petitioner and Mr.S.Suri Babu,
learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the record.
2. The present tax revision case has been filed by the State
under Section 22(1) read with Rule 10 of the APGST Act, 1957
and the Rules, for the assessment year 1997-1998.
3. From the perusal of record we find that the dispute in the
instant tax revision case is for claim of interest by the State which
was refused by the learned Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal by the
impugned order. We also find that against the original assessment
order, the State had preferred TREVC.No.140 of 2008, which was
also stood dismissed on 08.01.2024, by the Division Bench of this
High Court.
4. In the light of the dismissal of the T.R.E.V.C.No.140 of
2008, the instant Tax Revision Case also liable to be and is
accordingly dismissed.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
__________________ P.SAM KOSHY, J
_______________________________ NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, J
23.06.2025 AQS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!