Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Shiva Sai Enterprises vs The Superintendent
2025 Latest Caselaw 4885 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4885 Tel
Judgement Date : 28 August, 2025

Telangana High Court

M/S. Shiva Sai Enterprises vs The Superintendent on 28 August, 2025

 THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH
                                    AND
              THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN


                WRIT PETITION No.21947 of 2025


ORDER:

Mr. M.Uma Shankar, learned counsel representing

Mr. V.Veeresham, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing

Counsel for Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs

(CBIC), appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled by

an order dated 18.12.2018 by respondent No.1. Petitioner

sought revocation by filing an application on 23.06.2025.

4. Rule 23 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules,

2017 prescribes as under:

"23. Revocation of cancellation of registration.-

(1) A registered person, whose registration is cancelled by the proper officer on his own motion, may, subject to the provisions of Rule 10B, submit an application for revocation of cancellation of

registration, in FORM GST REG-21, to such proper officer, within a period of ninety days from the date of the service of the order of cancellation of registration at the common portal, either directly or through a Facilitation Centre notified by the Commissioner:

PROVIDED that such period may, on sufficient cause being shown and for reasons to be recorded in writing, be extended by the Commissioner or an officer authorized by him in this behalf, not below the rank of Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner, as the case may be, for a further period not exceeding one hundred and eighty days:

PROVIDED FURTHER that no application for revocation shall be filed, if the registration has been cancelled for the failure of the registered person to furnish returns, unless such returns are furnished and any amount due as tax, in terms of such returns, has been paid along with any amount payable towards interest, penalty and late fee in respect of the said returns:

PROVIDED ALSO that all returns due for the period from the date of the order of cancellation of registration till the date of the order of revocation of cancellation of registration shall be furnished by the said person within a period of thirty days from the date of order of revocation of cancellation of registration:

PROVIDED ALSO that where the registration has been cancelled with retrospective effect, the registered person shall furnish all returns relating to period from the effective date of cancellation of registration till the date of order of revocation of cancellation of registration within a period of thirty days from the date of order of revocation of cancellation of registration. (2) (a) Where the proper officer is satisfied, for reasons to be recorded in writing, that there are sufficient grounds for revocation of cancellation of registration, he shall revoke the cancellation of registration by an order in FORM GST REG-22 within a period of thirty days from the date of the

receipt of the application and communicate the same to the applicant.

(b) The proper officer may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, under circumstances other than those specified in clause (a), by an order in FORM GST REG-05, reject the application for revocation of cancellation of registration and communicate the same to the applicant.

(3) The proper officer shall, before passing the order referred to in clause (b) of sub-rule (2), issue a notice in FORM GST REG-23 requiring the applicant to show cause as to why the application submitted for revocation under sub-rule (1) should not be rejected and the applicant shall furnish the reply within a period of seven working days from the date of the service of the notice in FORM GSTREG-24.

(4) Upon receipt of the information or clarification in FORM GST REG-24, the proper officer shall proceed to dispose of the application in the manner specified in sub-rule (2) within a period of thirty days from the date of the receipt of such information or clarification from the applicant."

5. On the previous date, learned counsel for the petitioner

had submitted that the petitioner is interested in carrying

out its business in the same name. Upon that, learned

Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC was asked to seek

instructions as to whether the revocation of cancellation of

its registration can be done now even after seven years or

that the petitioner can be allowed to continue its business on

the same name. On instructions, he submits today that

though the petitioner can undertake business on the same

name, but it will have to take a fresh registration number

after clearing all the previous dues.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

petitioner is interested in pursuing with the same business

in the same GSTIN number. He has referred to a decision of

the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Apitco Ltd. v.

The Union of India 1 and submitted that this Court had

allowed the petitioner to appear before the respondent

authorities and after furnishing all the entire GST returns till

that date with requisite fee and penalty, directed the

respondents to restore the GST registration without any

further scrutiny so far as the default of non-payment of GST

returns till that date was concerned. The same was as a one

time measure.

7. From perusal of the said judgment, it appears that the

petitioner could not file returns from time to time leading to

issuance of a show cause notice on 14.01.2023. In the

instant case, before the COVID pandemic intervened, the

1 2024 (3) TMI 1161

GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled on

18.12.2018. The facts of the cited judgment are, therefore,

distinguishable.

8. Therefore, we deem it proper to dispose of the writ

petition with liberty to the petitioner to seek a fresh

registration in the same name after clearing its dues and

other statutory compliances. If such an application is made

within a period of 10 days, the respondent authorities would

consider it, in accordance with law.

9. Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. However,

there shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

closed.

______________________________________ APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ

______________________________________ G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J

Date: 28.08.2025 KL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter