Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4878 Tel
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2025
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
TREVC No.88 OF 2009
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Mr. T. Chaitanya Kiran, learned Assistant
Government Pleader representing the learned Special Government
Pleader for the State Tax for the petitioner/State and Mr. Tarun
Chadha, learned counsel representing Mr. S.Dwarakanath, learned
counsel for the respondent. Perused the record.
2. The instant tax revision case is by the State assailing the
order dated 31.12.2008 passed by Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal
(STAT), Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad in T.A.No.582 of 2002.
3. The question of law involved in the instant case is as to
whether the learned STAT was justified in allowing the appeal
preferred by the respondent/assessee so far as the sale of cement
made by the respondent/assessee to the Zilla Parishad Engineering
Division is concerned. The question of law was whether the sale
made to the Zilla Parishad Engineering Division would amount to
sale being made to the State. The said question of law also came
up for consideration in two decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of HEAVY MAZDOOR UNION vs. STATE
OF BIHAR AND OTHERS 1 and subsequently again in the case
of M/s AJIT SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB 2. In both the
decisions, it has been categorically held by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court that Gram Panchayats would also be treated as a State, as
defined under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Relying on
the aforesaid two decisions of the Hon'ble Court, this Court
recently in TREVC No.101 of 2009 dismissed a similar tax
revision case preferred by the State Government vide its decision
dated 10.04.2025. The question of law in the instant tax revision
case is also of identical nature.
4. In view of the same, we are inclined to endorse the same
view passed by this Court in TREVC No.101 of 2009, decided on
10.04.2025.
(1969)1 SCC 765
AIR 1967 8556 SC
5. The tax revision case, accordingly, stands dismissed,
upholding the order passed by the Tribunal. There shall be no
order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
_____________________ P.SAM KOSHY, J
_________________________________ SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, J 25.08.2025 Lrkm/Ggd
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!