Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2385 Tel
Judgement Date : 25 June, 2024
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.2591 of 2024
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, is filed by the petitioner, seeking the following relief:
"...to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.3 to 5 in non-considering representation/application of the petitioner and non- initiating to release Rythu Bheema to the petitioner on the death of husband of the petitioner by name, Dunna Pedda Venkataiah, S/o.Sayanna, who died on 15-09-2023 by having Rythu Bandhu insurance No.1990338 dated 14-08-2018 and master policy No.504504504, basing on the death of husband of the petitioner, is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles, 14, 15 and 21 of Constitution of India and also violative of natural justice and consequently to direct respondent Nos.3 to 5 to pay Rythu Bheema scheme amount to the petitioner on the death of petitioner's husband, and do the needful justice to the Petitioner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case...."
2. The petitioner claims to be nominee of the policy holder-Late
Sri Dunna Pedda Venkataiah, who was enrolled in Rythu Bima
Scheme for the Policy Year 2018-19 vide LIC ID No.1990338 dated
14.08.2018 under Master Policy No.504504504 and the same was
renewed for the Policy Years 2018-19 and 2020-21. The State
Government with a laudable object to give guarantee to the poor
and marginal farmers for their livelihood, has introduced "Farmers
Group Life Insurance Scheme" (Rythu Bima) in addition to other
incentive schemes. The Rythu Bima Scheme is implemented basing
on the farmers-wise online agricultural land database through
Information Technology and Online Portals that are being used by
all the outreach officers for effective and efficient implementation.
The main objective of Rythu Bima scheme is to ensure financial
security and relief to the bereaved family members of the deceased
farmer, who is in the age group between 18 and 59 years and
eligible for enrollment under the Scheme. The age of the farmers
would be determined basing on the particulars furnished in
Aadhaar Card. The entire premium is paid by the Government to
the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) and in the event of death of the
enrolled farmer/ insured, due to any cause, the insured amount of
Rs.5,00,000/- would be deposited in the nominee's account. The
uniqueness of the Scheme is that nominee is not required to
approach the Insurance Company for settlement of the claim but
the Officers of the Village level would collect data from the Revenue
Department in the event of loss of life of any farmer/insured and
forward the same to the Insurance Company for onward
transmission of the claim amount. It is the case of the petitioner
that her husband, who was enrolled under the Rythu Bima Scheme,
expired on 15.09.2023 and enclosing the death certificate of her
deceased-husband and also Aadhaar card in proof of date of birth of
her husband as 11.09.1961, the petitioner requested the
respondents to release the claim amount of Rs.5,00,000/-. The
grievance of the petitioner is that even though her husband is
entitled for claim amount under Rythu Bima Policy, the respondents
have not renewed the Rythu Bima Policy and not releasing the claim
amount, stating that her husband has crossed the age limit
prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.63 Agriculture and Cooperation (Agri.II)
Department dated 19.06.2018.
3. The Respondents filed counter affidavits inter alia stating that
vide G.O.Ms.No.63 Agriculture and Cooperation (Agr.II) Department
dated 19.06.2018, the Government has introduced the Rythu Bima
Scheme to provide financial relief and security to the family
members/dependants of the deceased farmer (pattadar) in case of
his/her death. It is stated that the list of farmers who are eligible to
be enrolled as members of the Rythu Bima scheme will be sent to
LIC every year and the said Scheme is governed as per the Terms
and Conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding entered
between the State Government and the LIC. The husband of the
petitioner was enrolled under the Scheme vide ID No.1990338 for
the policy year 2018-2019 (14.08.2018 to 13.08.2019) on the basis
of particulars recorded in Aadhaar No.566603820628 and the
entries made in pattedar passbook No.T28250180446. At the time
of enrollment, the deceased mentioned his date of birth as
11.09.1961. The case of the respondents is that the deceased
farmer has crossed the maximum eligibility age of 59 years as on
date of renewal for policy year 2021-22 i.e, 14.08.2021 (completed
59 years 11 months and 3 days) and hence ineligible to be covered
under Rythu Bima Scheme as per the terms and conditions of
eligibility with respect to age. It is also stated the Government of
Telangana has not included the deceased farmer in the list of
"Insurer Members" for the policy year 2021-2022 and onwards
because he has crossed maximum age limit prescribed under R.B.
Scheme and the premium amount was also not paid to the
Insurance Company.
4. Considered the rival submissions of learned counsel for both
sides and perused the record.
5. The State Government with a laudable object has introduced
Farmers Group Life Insurance Scheme commonly called as "Rythu
Bima Scheme" vide G.O.Ms.No.63 dated 19.06.2018 for providing
financial relief and social security to the family members/
dependants, in case of loss of farmer's life due to any reason. The
Government had entered into Memorandum of Understanding with
the respondent No.8 and formulated certain guidelines for
enrollment of the farmers into the said Scheme. As per the terms of
the Memorandum of Understanding, the State Government will pay
premium to respondent No.8 on behalf of the farmer, who got
enrolled in Rythu Bima Scheme. The Scheme is being renewed on
annual basis. The holders of digitally signed pattedar passbooks
(agricultural land owners), who are in the age group of 18 to 59
years are eligible for enrolment under the scheme and the age of the
insured would be determined basing on the age mentioned in the
Aadhaar card. In case, only year is mentioned in the Aadhaar card,
the default date would be taken as 1st July of that particular year.
The Agricultural Extension Officer basing on the information
recorded in the Dharani Portal, is competent to update the
particulars of the beneficiary and nominees of the insured. The
claim applications would be sent to the respondent No.8 for
verification and transmission of claim amount to the nominees. The
application of the deceased for Rythu Bima Scheme for the policy
year 2018-19 was registered with the respondent No.8 vide LIC ID
No.1990338 after verification of the details furnished in the
documents enclosed i.e, Aadhaar card and pattedar passbooks and
title deeds. In the insurance certificate issued by the respondent
No.8, the date of birth of the deceased is mentioned as 11.09.1961
and in the copy of the Aadhaar card of the deceased, the date of
birth is mentioned as 11.09.1961. As per Rythu Bima Scheme, the
farmers who are aged between 18 and 59 years as on 14.08.2018
i.e, born between 14.08.1959 and 15.08.2020 are eligible for
enrollment for the policy year 2018-19. According to the
respondents, the deceased farmer has crossed the maximum
eligibility age of 59 years as on the date of renewal policy for the
year 2021-22 i.e, 14.08.2021 (completed 59 years 11 months and 3
days) and hence the deceased farmer is ineligible to be covered
under Rythu Bima Scheme as per the terms and conditions of
eligibility with respect to age. Further, it is revealed that the
Government of Telangana has not included the name of the
deceased-husband of the petitioner in the list of insured members
for the policy year 2021-2022 and onwards since he has crossed 59
years and disqualified for enrollment and also not paid the premium
amount.
6. The Hon'ble Apex Court in Hirandra Kumar v. High Court
of Judicature at Allahabad & another 1, emphasizing that the
determination of the cut-off date is within the sphere of the
Executive and the Court cannot assume that function, observed as
follows:
"21. The legal principles which govern the determination of a cut-off date are well settled. The power to fix a cut-off date or age-limit is incidental to the regulatory control which an authority exercises over the selection process. A certain degree of arbitrariness may appear on the face of any cut-off or age-limit which is prescribed, since a candidate on
(2020) 17 SCC 401
the wrong side of the line may stand excluded as a consequence. That, however, is no reason to hold that the cut-off which is prescribed, is arbitrary. In order to declare that a cut-off is arbitrary and ultra vires, it must be of such a nature as to lead to the conclusion that it has been fixed without any rational basis whatsoever or is manifestly unreasonable so as to lead to a conclusion of a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution.
27....the validity of the Rule cannot be made to depend on cases of individual hardship which inevitably arise in applying a principle of general application. Essentially, the determination of cut-off dates lies in the realm of policy. A court in the exercise of the power of judicial review does not takeover the function for itself. Plainly, it is for the rule- making authority to discharge that function while making the Rules."
7. As per the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in
catena of judgments, the State is having power to formulate the
policy and determine the cut-off date for implementation of the
Schemes. As long as the said policy is not discriminative and
violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and the same is
based on certain objective considerations and rational basis, the
said policy is not amenable to the judicial review. In the instant
case, the respondents have fixed age criteria for the enrolment of
the farmers between the age group of 18 and 59 years with an
object to provide financial relief and security to the
members/dependants of the deceased farmers. The policy
enunciated by the Government does not suffer from vice of
arbitrariness nor any discrimination among the class of farmers
community to read down the conditions. No case is made out by the
petitioner calling for interference by this Court under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India.
8. For the foregoing reasons, the present writ petition filed by
the petitioner is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be
dismissed.
9. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
_________________________ C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J Date: 25.06.2024 scs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!