Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Union Of India And 2Others vs K.Chenthama Rakshan
2022 Latest Caselaw 3108 Tel

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3108 Tel
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2022

Telangana High Court
The Union Of India And 2Others vs K.Chenthama Rakshan on 28 June, 2022
Bench: P Naveen Rao, Sambasivarao Naidu
           HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

       HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU

                   W.P. No. 26016 of 2022

                      Date : 28.06.2022

Between:
The Union of India and 2others
rep by its General Manager South Central Railways Rail
Nilayam Secunderabad & others

                                                    Petitioners

                             And
K Chenthama Rakshan S/o Eithachan Nair
Aged about 60 years Occ TechnicianI Retd in the
0/o Senior Section Engineer Electrical South Central Railway
Bellampalli R/o 1251/3
Bathakammakunta
Opp St Anns School
Taranaka Hyderabad
                                                    Respondent

The Court made the following:

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU

W.P. No. 26016 of 2022

ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice P Naveen Rao)

Heard learned Assistant Solicitor General Sri N.Rajeshwar Rao

for petitioners.

2. Respondent was appointed as casual mazdoor on

22.2.1979 and he was accorded temporary status w.e.f. 1.1.1983 and

his services were regularized with effect from 12.6.1990 as Electrical

Khalasi. According to respondent, as per the judgment of the

Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Rakesh Kumar1 he is entitled

for computation of 50 % of the casual service rendered by him for the

purpose of determination of pension. Thus, he filed O.A.

No.021/231/2018 before the Central Administrative Tribunal

Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad to implement the decision of the

Supreme Court in Rakesh Kumar and to compute 50 % of the casual

service for counting qualifying service for pensionary benefits.

3. The Tribunal following the judgment of the Supreme

Court in Rakesh Kumar directed computation of 50 % of the casual

service towards determination of monitory and pensionary benefits.

Aggrieved thereby, Union of India filed this writ petition.

(2017) 13 SCC 388

4. Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rakesh Kumar extensively

considered the issue of computation of casual service for the purpose

of determination of pension payable to an employee on his retirement.

Paragraph 53 reads as under:

53. In view of the foregoing discussion, we hold:

53.1. The casual worker after obtaining temporary status is entitled to reckon 50% of his services till he is regularised on a regular/temporary post for the purposes of calculation of pension.

53.2. The casual worker before obtaining the temporary status is also entitled to reckon 50% of casual service for the purposes of pension.

53.3. Those casual workers who are appointed to any post either substantively or in officiating or in temporary capacity are entitled to reckon the entire period from date of taking charge of such post as per Rule 20 of the 1993 Rules.

53.4. It is open to the Pension Sanctioning Authority to recommend for relaxation in deserving case to the Railway Board for dispensing with or relaxing requirement of any rule with regard to those casual workers who have been subsequently absorbed against the post and do not fulfil the requirement of existing rule for grant of pension, in deserving cases. On a request made in writing, the Pension Sanctioning Authority shall consider as to whether any particular case deserves to be considered for recommendation for relaxation under Rule 107 of the 1993 Rules."

5. From the reading of paragraphs 53.1 and 53.2,

it is clear that an employee is entitled for computation of 50 % of the

casual service rendered by him before he was granted temporary

service till regularization of his services for determination of his

pension.

6. The Tribunal followed the said decision while giving

directions to the petitioners.

7. We do not see any error in the directions of the Tribunal

for determination of pension by counting 50 % of the casual service

rendered before granting temporary appointment towards

determination of pensionary benefits, warranting interference of this

Court. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and same is dismissed.

No costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending stand closed.

__________________ P NAVEEN RAO,J

_________________________ SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU,J

DATE:28.06.2022 TVK HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU

W.P. No. 26016 of 2022

Date : 28.06.2022

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter