Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2897 Tel
Judgement Date : 17 June, 2022
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU
MACMA No.993 of 2018
JUDGMENT :
Aggrieved by the award passed by the Motor Vehicles
Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mahabubnagar in
M.V.O.P.No.454 of 2011, the appellant who is shown as
second respondent in the above said O.P. preferred this appeal
with a prayer to set aside the award.
While advancing the arguments, the learned counsel
for the appellant fairly submitted that already the Court
below granted liberty to the insurance company to pay the
award amount together with interest and then recover the
same from the owner of the vehicle. The main grievance
of the appellant herein is the Tribunal committed
an error in awarding interest @ 9% per annum instead of
7.5% per annum as held by the Apex Court in
Sarala Verma and others Vs Delhi Transport Corporation1.
(2009) 6 SCC 121 SSRN,J
Now the learned counsel submitted that the award may
be modified on the same lines. Even though, the learned
counsel disputed the finding of the Court below about the
calculations, I am of the opinion that the amounts arrived by
the Court below are quite reasonable. However, in view of the
Judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Sarala Verma (supra)
and National Insurance Co., Ltd., Vs Pranay Sethi2 cases,
the rate of interest can be reduced from 9% per annum to 7.5%
per annum without disturbing the other findings.
Therefore, appeal is partly allowed by reducing the rate
of interest awarded on the compensation from 9% per annum
to 7.5% per annum and other findings are not disturbed.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________________ JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU 17th June, 2022.
PLV
(2017) 16 SCC 680 SSRN,J
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!