Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 301 Tel
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2022
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
M.A.C.M.A. No.729 of 2007
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is filed by the appellant-claimant aggrieved by
the award and decree, dated 20.02.2007 passed in O.P.No.619 of
2006 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-
cum-IV Additional District Judge, Warangal (for short, the
Tribunal).
For the sake of convenience, the parties have been referred
to as arrayed before the Tribunal.
The claimant filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor
Vehicles Act claiming compensation of Rs.2,75,000/- for the
injuries sustained by her in a motor vehicle accident. It is stated
that on 24.10.2005 while the deceased was waiting for a bus by
standing at a side of the road at Fort Road Petrol Pump Bus Stop,
one Hero Honda Motor Cycle bearing No.AP 36 K 6605 came at high
speed in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the
claimant. As a result of which, the claimant sustained grievous
injuries and she was shifted to Rohini Super Speciality Hospital,
Hanamkonda, where an operation was conducted on 24.10.2005 for
her brain injury and she took treatment as inpatient from
24.10.2005 to 20.11.2005. It is further stated that at the time of
discharge, the doctors advised her to take bed rest for three
months and to come up for follow up treatment and she spent
Rs.75,000/- towards medical expenses. The claimant filed
GSD, J Macma_729_2007
aforesaid O.P. against respondent Nos.1 and 2, being owner and
insurer of the aforesaid Hero Honda Motor Cycle, respectively,
claiming compensation of Rs.2,75,000/- for the disability sustained
by her.
Before the Tribunal, the 1st respondent remained ex parte
and the 2nd respondent also filed counter denying the averments of
the claim petition and contended that the amount claimed is
excessive and prayed to dismiss the claim petition.
Basing on the above pleadings, the following issues are
framed before the Tribunal:-
1) Whether the accident took place on 24.10.2005 was caused due to rash and negligent driving of Hero Honda CD 100 2003 model bearing No.AP 36 K 6605 by its driver?
2) Whether, the petitioner is entitled for compensation? If so, what amount and from whom?
3) To what relief?
During trial, on behalf of the claimant, P.Ws.1 and 2 were
examined and got marked Exs.A1 to A11. On behalf of the
respondents, neither oral nor documentary evidence was adduced.
After considering the oral and documentary evidence on
record, the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the accident
occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of driver of the Hero
Honda Motor Cycle and accordingly, awarded total compensation of
Rs.74,900/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum. Being not satisfied
GSD, J Macma_729_2007
with the said amount, the claimant filed the present appeal
seeking enhancement of compensation.
Heard both sides.
The finding of the Tribunal with regard to the manner in
which the accident took place has become final as the same is not
challenged either by the owner or insurer of the vehicle.
The short question that arises for consideration is "whether
the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and equitable"?
A perusal of Ex.A6 i.e., discharge bill shows that the
claimant has incurred a sum of Rs.26,025/- towards hospital
charges, but the learned Tribunal only basing on the net amount
shown in the said bill has taken into consideration the amount of
Rs.4,525/- towards hospital charges. In the facts and
circumstances of the case, this Court feels that claimant is entitled
another amount of Rs.21,500/- towards hospital charges. Except
the enhancement of Rs.21,500/-, rest of the amount awarded by
the Tribunal remains un-changed as the claimant has not sustained
any permanent or partial disability and the Tribunal after
considering all the aspects such as injuries sustained by the
claimant, extra nourishment and pain and suffering.
In the result, the M.A.C.M.A. is partly allowed by enhancing
the compensation amount awarded by the Tribunal from
Rs.74,900/- to Rs.96,400/-. The enhanced amount shall carry
GSD, J Macma_729_2007
interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of award i.e., 20.02.2007
till the date of realization. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this appeal, shall
stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI 28.01.2022 gkv
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!