Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 805 Tel
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2022
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
&
HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.6042 OF 2018
Date: 21.02.2022
Between:
D.Bikshapathi Sridhar, s/o. Bikshapathi,
Aged 36 years, occu: RPF Constable,
Plot No.41, Padmavathi Colony,
Boduppal, Ranga Reddy district,
Hyderabad, T.S.
..... Petitioner /
Judgment Debtor No.3
and
Shriram Chits Pvt. Ltd., rep.by its
Divisional Manager, Sri T.Parameswar Rao,
s/o.T.narsimha Rao, Aged about 42 years,
occu: Divisional Manager, r/o.Secunderabad,
Regd.Office at # 44, S.D.Road, Secunderabad.
.....Respondent/
Decree Holder
D.Srinivas and others.
.... Respondents/ Judgment Debtors
The Court made the following:
PNR,J & GRR,J CRP No.6042 of 2018
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO & HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.6042 OF 2018
ORDER: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Naveen Rao)
Heard Smt. T.Shiva Parvathi learned counsel for
petitioner and Mr. Maheswara Rao Kuncham learned counsel
for respondent no.1.
2. On a dispute raised by the respondent-Chit Fund
Company, the Arbitrator registered the dispute as A.B.R./
C.F.No.180 of 2014 and passed award in quantifying the
amount payable to the Chit Fund Company as 7,99,578/-
and also awarded costs and interests and quantified the total
amount of 9,46,190/-. Alleging that said amount is not paid
by the Judgment Debtors, the Decree-holder filed E.P.No.46 of
2017 in the Court of III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at
Secunderabad. The Execution Court by order dated 17.08.2018,
allowed the E.P., directing the Judgment Debtor to make
payment of E.P. claimed amount with interest within ten days to
the Decree-holder, failing which the Decree-holder is at liberty PNR,J & GRR,J CRP No.6042 of 2018
to seek attachment of salary of Judgment Debtor No.3, i.e.,
petitioner herein.
3. This Revision is preferred challenging the said order on
the ground that III Additional Senior Civil Judge has no
jurisdiction to entertain the E.P. It is also contended that for
the last more than three years an amount of 12,000/- per
month has been recovered from the salary of the petitioner
towards attachment amount, causing lot of suffering and
hardship and that there are other Judgment Debtors from
whom amount could have been recovered. Learned counsel for
the petitioner earnestly appeals to reduce the amount of
attachment per month.
4. In M/s.Shriram Chits Private Limited, rep.by its GPA
Holder and General Manager v. B.Durgaprasad Rao and
others1, the Division Bench upheld the maintainability of the
Execution Petition in an arbitration award made under the Chit
Fund Act before the civil Court having pecuniary jurisdiction.
From the salary slip placed before us, it is seen that employee is
drawing about 70,000/- per month and what was directed to
be deducted towards the decretal amount is only 12,000/-.
2017(1) ALT 8 (D.B.) PNR,J & GRR,J CRP No.6042 of 2018
In addition only few other amounts are recovered from him and
that the order of attachment does not violate Section 60 of the
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for this Court to intervene and
reduce the attachment amount per month. We do not see any
error in the decision of the trial Court warranting our
interference. This Civil Revision Petition is dismissed.
Pending miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
______________________________ DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI Date: 21.02.2022 Kkm PNR,J & GRR,J CRP No.6042 of 2018
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO & HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.6042 OF 2018
Date: 21.02.2022 kkm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!