Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. M.Vanaja vs Sri Chamarthi Ravi Shankar
2022 Latest Caselaw 4019 Tel

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4019 Tel
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2022

Telangana High Court
Smt. M.Vanaja vs Sri Chamarthi Ravi Shankar on 2 August, 2022
Bench: Ujjal Bhuyan, N.V.Shravan Kumar
      THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
                                       AND
      THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR


                WRIT APPEAL No.378 of 2022

JUDGMENT:     (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan)



     Heard Mr. J.Ashvini Kumar, learned counsel for the

appellant and Mr. K.L.N.Raghavendra Reddy, learned

counsel for respondents No.1 and 2. Also heard Mr. Parsa

Ananth Nageswar Rao, learned Government Pleader

appearing for respondents No.3 to 5.

2. This appeal has been preferred against the

interlocutory order dated 21.01.2022 passed by the learned

Single Judge in W.P.No.927 of 2022 filed by respondents

No.1 and 2.

3. Order dated 21.01.2022 reads as under:

"Notice before admission returnable by 25.02.2022.

Personal service is permitted on the 4th respondent.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Court passed orders in C.R.P.No.2035 of 2021 on 23.12.2021 staying further proceedings in

O.S.No.346 of 2015 pending on the file of IX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad; the impugned refusal order was passed on the ground that status quo order was passed against the petitioners in I.A.No.498 of 2015 in O.S.No.346 of 2015; in view of the said stay order, the 3rd respondent is bound to release the sale document bearing P.No.183/2021 dated 07.12.2021.

It needs to be noted that the order passed by this Court on 23.12.2021 in C.R.P.No.2035 of 2021 was not brought to the notice of the 3rd respondent.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners are permitted to approach the 3rd respondent

- Sub Registrar, Sanjeev Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad and intimate the authority about the order dated 23.12.2021 passed in C.R.P.No.2035 of 2021 whereunder proceedings in O.S.No.346 of 2015 are being stayed. On such request of the petitioners, the 3rd respondent shall process the pending document P.No.183/2021 dated 07.12.2021 and release the same if it is otherwise in accordance with law.

Post on 25.02.2022."

4. Appellant herein is respondent No.4 in the writ

proceedings.

5. On 10.06.2022 this Court while issuing notice had

passed the following order:

"Learned counsel for the appellant has argued before this Court that in civil suit i.e., O.S.No.346 of 2015 an order of status quo was granted and in spite of

the order of status quo, a sale deed was executed in respect of the property which is the subject matter of the civil suit. He has stated that on account of the status quo order, no such sale deed could have been executed.

Learned counsel for the appellant has been able to make out a prima facie case for grant of interim relief.

Resultantly, the operation of the order passed by the learned Single Judge is hereby stayed.

It is made clear that this Court has not stayed the proceedings in W.P.No.927 of 2022 and only the interim order granted by the learned Single Judge has been stayed. The learned Single Judge shall certainly be free to proceed ahead with the hearing of the matter.

prays for time to file reply. He is granted four weeks time to do the needful."

6. On due consideration, we are of the view that since

the related writ petition is pending adjudication before the

learned Single Judge, the parties may make their

respective submissions before the learned Single. As a

matter of fact in the order dated 10.06.2022 this Court had

made it clear that proceedings in W.P.No.927 of 2022 has

not been stayed and only the interlocutory order has been

stayed. Parallel proceedings are not desirable.

7. That being the position and without expressing any

opinion on merit, we are of the view that W.P.No.927 of

2022 may be heard and decided on its own merits. Till

disposal of W.P.No.927 of 2022, interim stay granted by the

appellate Court on 10.06.2022 would continue, which

would however abide by the final decision that may be

rendered in W.P.No.927 of 2022.

8. This disposes of the writ appeal.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

______________________________________ UJJAL BHUYAN, CJ

______________________________________ N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR, J

02.08.2022 vs

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter