HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT APPEAL No.591 of 2020
04.01.2021
Between:
Jangili Sattaiah
...Appellant
and
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department,
Hyderabad and 5 others.
...Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. R. Anurag
Counsel for the respondents: Mr. T. Srikanth Reddy GP for Home
The Court made the following:
2
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy)
This writ appeal has been filed challenging the order dated
23.12.2020 passed by a learned Single in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in
W.P.No.13187 of 2019, whereby the learned Single Judge, having found
that the application in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.13187 of 2019 was not
argued by the learned counsel for the appellant-writ petitioner, and time
was sought again and again, stayed the operation of the interim order dated
27.09.2019 granted earlier.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned
Government Pleader for Revenue, who has vehemently opposed grant of
any interim order in this appeal.
Since the learned Single Judge did not extend the interim stay
orders, as the learned counsel for the petitioner was not cooperating with
hearing in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.13187 of 2019, we do not find any
merit in this appeal.
The writ appeal is, accordingly, disposed of giving liberty to the
appellant to file an application for extension of interim orders in I.A.No.1
of 2019 in W.P.No.13187 of 2019 by filing necessary application.
However, if I.A.No.1 of 2019 or vacate stay petition, as the case may, are
taken up for hearing by the learned Single Judge, the learned counsel for
the appellant-writ petitioner shall argue the matter without taking any
adjournment. There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, CJ
__________________ B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J 04.01.2021 Lrkm
