Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4065 Tel
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2021
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI
WRIT APPEAL No.836 of 2019
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)
The present writ appeal is arising out of the order
dated 16.09.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in
W.P.No.19947 of 2019.
The undisputed facts of the case reveal that the
appellant before this Court filed the writ petition making
allegations that certain persons have encroached upon
his property and they are making constructions, in spite
of status quo order, over the property in dispute. The
facts also reveal that a civil suit was also preferred by the
appellant and a status quo order was passed in
O.S.No.254 of 2019 pending before the learned VII
Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District. The
learned Single Judge, as the civil suit was pending
between the parties, disposed of the writ petition with a
liberty to the appellant to avail the remedy as provided
under the Code of Civil Procedure, to be more specific,
under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil
Procedure. Now the writ appeal has been filed in the
matter.
2
This Court really fails to understand that in a case
where a civil suit is pending, there is an order of status
quo and the same is being violated, how a writ petition
and a writ appeal can be entertained.
Resultantly, the admission is declined and the writ
appeal is also dismissed with a liberty to the appellant to
avail the remedies available under the Code of Civil
Procedure.
The miscellaneous applications pending in this writ
appeal, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
___________________________
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ
___________________________
N. TUKARAMJI, J
01.12.2021
vs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!