Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 4730 Raj
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:14573]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7082/2026
Bherulal Mali S/o Ratan Lal, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Karunda,
The Chhoti Sadri, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Commissioner, Transport
And Road Safety, Jaipur
2. Regional Transport Authority, Udaipur (Raj.)
3. District Tranport Officer, Udaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepesh Gurjar
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Soni for
Mr. B.L. Bhati, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
28/03/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following
prayer :-
"It is therefore, most humbly, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Civil Writ Petition may kindly be allowed: -
a. Prayed that this Hon'ble Court if deemed proper please to call for the entire record relating to this case and after pursuing the same please to accept and allow this writ petition.
b. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned cancellation order dated 14.11.2025 (Annex-
6) may kindly be declared illegal, unjust and same may kindly be quashed and set aside, and by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents be directed to restore the registration certificate of vehicle No. RJ-27-
GD-0749.
c. Any other appropriate order, which may be considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.
d. Costs of the petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner."
(Uploaded on 28/03/2026 at 04:18:00 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:14573] (2 of 3) [CW-7082/2026]
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an identical
petition being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13577/2025 (Rahul
Gehlot Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) along with bunch
of writ petitions, has been disposed of by a Co-ordinate Bench of
this Court vide order dated 08.12.2025, wherein it was observed
as under :-
"6. In view of the proposal made by the respondent- department and so also the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, the Court deems just and proper to dispose the writ petitions as under.
i. The petitioners shall submit their representation within a period of four weeks from today to the respective registration authority giving out the complete details as regards their purchase and registration of their vehicle. If no such representation is filed within given time, this order will render ineffective qua such petitioner and the impugned notice will got revived automatically. ii. On receiving the representation from the petitioners, the respondent authorities shall after taking into consideration the averments made in the representation, the record available with them in respect of the vehicles in question and after due verification from the earlier registering authorities of the vehicle, shall make an inquiry as regards the allegations against the petitioners.
iii. On making an inquiry, if the respondent authorities found some substance in the allegations against the petitioners, they shall issue a show cause notice to the petitioners giving out the details and the basis of allegations.
iv. After issuing the notices, the respondents shall proceed in the matter strictly in accordance with the law and pass appropriate orders.
v. Till issuance of the final orders by the respondent authorities after completion of the process as observed above, no coercive shall be taken against the petitioners and all notices/orders as regards the cancellation or suspension of the registration certificates issued by now, shall stand quashed qua the petitioners.
vi. It is also made clear that the petitioners shall not transfer/sell the vehicles in question to any other third party till final orders are passed by the respondent authority and in the meantime, all regular fitness, renewal, insurance, permit, etc., shall continue as like a normal case.
vii. It is also made clear that this order will not come in any way in investigation of any criminal case registered in this regard.
7. All the petitions stand disposed of accordingly.
8. All pending applications, if any, shall disposed of."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the
present petition may also be decided in the same terms as in the
case of Rahul Gehlot (supra).
(Uploaded on 28/03/2026 at 04:18:00 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:14573] (3 of 3) [CW-7082/2026]
4. Learned counsel for the respondents does not oppose the above
submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. In view of the submissions made above, the present writ
petition is disposed of in the same terms as Rahul Gehlot
(supra).
6. Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 249-sonia/-
(Uploaded on 28/03/2026 at 04:18:00 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!