Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 512 Raj
Judgement Date : 14 January, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:2180]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 48/2026
Mubarak S/o Ali Khan, Aged About 25 Years, Bhagujiro Ki
Dhaniya Aau District Pholodi Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. MS Sisodiya
Mr. Naresh Charaniya
For Respondent(s) : Mr. NS Chandawat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
14/01/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal revision petition,
challenge has been made to the order dated 25.11.2025 passed
by the learned Addl. District Judge (Special Judge NDPS Act
Cases) District Phalodi in Criminal Misc. Application No.635/2025
pertaining to FIR No.31/2025 registered at Police Station Bhojasar,
District Phalodi whereby the prayer made by the petitioner for
releasing the vehicle in question (Motorcycle) bearing registration
No. RJ-43-SF-4429 has been declined.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is the
owner of the vehicle in question which has been seized by the
Police Officers. He further submits that the petitioner being the
owner of the vehicle in question, is the person best entitled to get
back the possession of the seized property. There is no other
person claiming supurdagi of the same.
(Uploaded on 15/01/2026 at 03:56:32 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:2180] (2 of 2) [CRLR-48/2026]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the instant criminal
revision petition.
4. Considering the submissions and following the judgment
rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in
AIR 2003 SC 638 and the order dated 18.11.2022 passed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.2005/2022 [SLP
(Crl.) No.7280/2022) titled as Sainaba Vs. The State of Kerala
& Anr., wherein, the vehicle involved in a crime under NDPS Act
was directed to be released on terms and conditions to be
determined by the Special Court, the revision petition is allowed
and this Court deems it just and appropriate to release the vehicle
in question in favour of the petitioner on interim custody till
conclusion of the trial provided he furnishes a Supurdaginama of
Rs. 50,000/- and surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the
Court below.
(FARJAND ALI),J 171-chhavi/-
(Uploaded on 15/01/2026 at 03:56:32 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!