Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abdul Majid @ Maajid vs Ramdev Saini (2026:Rj-Jd:9424)
2026 Latest Caselaw 2891 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2891 Raj
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Abdul Majid @ Maajid vs Ramdev Saini (2026:Rj-Jd:9424) on 20 February, 2026

Author: Rekha Borana
Bench: Rekha Borana
[2026:RJ-JD:9424]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                    S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2244/2022

1.       Abdul Majid @ Maajid S/o Ahmad Khan Musalman, Aged
         About 70 Years, R/o Ward No. 5, Gazi Nagri, Bad Ka
         Chowk, Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.
2.       Salman Bano W/o Abdul Majid @ Maajid Musalman, Aged
         About 68 Years, R/o Ward No. 5, Gazi Nagri, Bad Ka
         Chowk, Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.
3.       Shama Parveen W/o Late Nisar Mohammad Musalman,
         Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 5, Gazi Nagri, Bad Ka
         Chowk, Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.
4.       Najumeen Banu D/o Late Nisar Mohammad Musalmanq,
         Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ward No. 5, Gazi Nagri, Bad Ka
         Chowk, Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.
5.       Javed Khan S/o Late Nisar Mohammad Musalman, Aged
         About 19 Years, R/o Ward No. 5, Gazi Nagri, Bad Ka
         Chowk, Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.
6.       Saniya Banu D/o Late Nisar Mohammad Musalman, Aged
         About 15 Years, Minor Through Their Natural Guardian
         Mother Shama Parven (Appellant No. 3),r/o Ward No. 5,
         Gazi Nagri, Bad Ka Chowk, Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.
7.       Ali Hussain S/o Late Nisar Mohammad Musalman, Aged
         About 13 Years, Minor Through Their Natural Guardian
         Mother Shama Parven (Appellant No. 3),r/o Ward No. 5,
         Gazi Nagri, Bad Ka Chowk, Jahazpur, District Bhilwar
                                                                      ----Appellants
                                       Versus
1.       Ramdev Saini S/o Sh. Jagdish Saini, R/o Village Mangli
         Khurd, Tehsil And Ps Hindoli, District Bundi (Raj.) (Owner)
2.       Mohan Lal S/o Sh. Bajrang Lal Kumawat, R/o Village
         Mangli Khurd, Mali Mohalla, Tehsil And Ps Hindoli, District
         Bundi (Raj.) (Driver)
3.       Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd., Through Its
         Chief Manager, Hdfc Ergo Gen. Ins. Co. Branch Jodhpur.
         (Raj.) (Insurer)
                                                                    ----Respondents




                         (Uploaded on 20/02/2026 at 02:14:52 PM)
                        (Downloaded on 20/02/2026 at 09:52:03 PM)
 [2026:RJ-JD:9424]                         (2 of 3)                           [CMA-2244/2022]



For Appellant(s)               :     Mr. Manish Kumar Pitaliya
For Respondent(s)              :     Mr. Vishal Singhal



              HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA

Order

20/02/2026

1. A joint submission has been made by learned counsels for

the claimants and the Insurance Company that a compromise has

been entered into between the parties in the spirit of Lok Adalat.

2. Counsel Mr. Vishal Singhal submits that he has been

authorised by the Insurance Company to enter into the said

compromise.

3. The present civil misc. appeal has been preferred by the

appellants seeking enhancement of the compensation amount as

awarded vide judgment dated 31.08.2022 passed by learned

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahpura, District Bhilwara in

MAC Case No.118/2018 whereby the claim of the appellants

seeking compensation against the respondents was partly allowed

holding defendant No.3-Insurance Company also jointly and

severally liable to pay compensation of Rs.9,33,928/- with interest

@6% per annum.

4. Counsel for the parties have placed on record a

memorandum of understanding/compromise entered into between

the parties, which is taken on record.

5. In view of the above and in the spirit of Lok Adalat, the

compensation amount as awarded vide impugned

judgment/Award dated 31.08.2022 is further enhanced by

Rs.5,00,000/- in favour of the claimants-appellants as a full and

(Uploaded on 20/02/2026 at 02:14:52 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:9424] (3 of 3) [CMA-2244/2022]

final settlement of the case. The amount so agreed shall be

deposited by the Insurance Company with the Tribunal within a

period of two months from today, failing which, the same shall

carry interest @7.5% per annum from the date of this order till

actual realization. The enhanced amount of compensation be

disbursed to the claimants in terms of the Award.

6. With the above observations, the present misc. appeal is

disposed of.

7. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

8. Let record be sent back to the learned Tribunal forthwith.

(REKHA BORANA),J 41-manila/-

(Uploaded on 20/02/2026 at 02:14:52 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter