Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gopal Ram Prajapat Alias Gopa Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:9300)
2026 Latest Caselaw 2844 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2844 Raj
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Gopal Ram Prajapat Alias Gopa Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:9300) on 19 February, 2026

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2026:RJ-JD:9300]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                    S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3809/2026
Gopal Ram Prajapat Alias Gopa Ram S/o Shri Viraram, Aged
About 46 Years, R/o Rasara Tala, Barmer, Rajasthan.
                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Deputy Secretary To
         Government,     Revenue       (Group-I)    Department,
         Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) -
         302001. Email Address - [email protected]
2.       District Collector, Barmer Having Its Office At Collectorate
         Premises, Tehsil And District Barmer.
3.       Sub-Divisional Officer, Sheo, Tehsil Sheo, District Barmer.
4.       Tehsildar (Land Records), Barmer, District Barmer.
5.       Gram Panchayat Mungariya, Panchayat Samiti - Sheo,
         District Barmer Through Its Village Development Officer,
         Having Its Office At Village Mungariya, Tehsil Sheo And
         District Barmer.
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Ramdev Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Sher Singh Rathore for
                                   Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, AAG


        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order 19/02/2026

By way of filing the present writ petition, the petitioner has

prayed for the following reliefs:-

'It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this petition for writ preferred by the petitioner may kindly be allowed in toto and the following reliefs may kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner:

A. By appropriate writ, order or direction, the notification dated 21.01.2025 (Annexure-06) issued by the District Collector-Barmer may kindly be quashed and set aside to the extent of creation of new revenue village "PUNJRAJSINGHPURA" from the existing revenue village 'Rasara Tala'.

B. By appropriate writ, order or direction, the entire consequences and proceeding arising out of the notification dated 21.01.2025 (Annexure-06) to the extent of revenue village "PUNJRAJSINGHPURA" that has taken place after issuance of notification may kindly be declared illegal and be

(Uploaded on 19/02/2026 at 02:51:56 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:9300] (2 of 2) [CW-3809/2026]

quashed and set aside and status qua ante may kindly be restored in all respect.

C. Any other order which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of petitioner."

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

having perused the material available on record, this Court finds

that the controversy involved in the present case is covered by the

judgment dated 23.09.2025 passed by this Court in a batch of writ

petitions led by "Mala Ram & Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.".

In the said judgment, this Court has held that a dispute with

regard to naming a newly created revenue village cannot be

entertained unless it is established beyond doubt that the revenue

village has been named after a particular person, deity or caste to

appease a particular religious or political group, or under the

influence of any politically influential person or representative, or

a living person closely associated with the affairs of the concerned

village, arbitrarily and mala fide.

3. In the present case, no material has been placed on record

to establish that the newly created revenue village,

Punjrajsinghpura, has been named under the influence of any

particular person or group of persons.

4. The writ petition is devoid of merit and is, therefore,

dismissed.

5. Stay petition and all pending applications, if any, stand

disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 45-divya/-

(Uploaded on 19/02/2026 at 02:51:56 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter