Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhagwana Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:9133)
2026 Latest Caselaw 2809 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2809 Raj
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Bhagwana Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:9133) on 19 February, 2026

Author: Nupur Bhati
Bench: Nupur Bhati
[2026:RJ-JD:9133]

   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
                     S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4124/2026

1.       Bhagwana Ram S/o Shri Babulal Ji, Aged About 49 Years, R/o
         Plot No. 188, 3Rd Kamla Nehru Nagar, Devi Road, Jodhpur.

2.       Rukhman Singh S/o Sh. Magga Ram, Aged About 46 Years, R/
         o Village Kapurdi District Barmer.

3.       Chutra Ram S/o Sh. Durga Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o
         Village And Post Bhimda, Tehsil Bayetu, District Barmer.

4.       Mahesh Kumar S/o Sh. Peera Ramji, Aged About 47 Years, R/o
         Village Gidda, Tehsil Chohtan, District Barmer.

5.       Kirtaram S/o Sh. Dhanna Ram, Aged About 51 Years, R/o
         Mukaam Post Naya Khartiya Vai Rawatsar, District Barmer.

6.       Ramu Dan S/o Shri Karni Dan, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Near
         Nandu Jewelers, Major Purn Singh Indira Colony, Bikaner.

                                                                      ----Petitioners

                                        Versus

1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Transport
         Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.       Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through The
         Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Choumu House, Jaipur,
         Rajasthan.

3.       Executive Director (Admin), Rsrtc, Parivahan Marg, Choumu
         House, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

4.       Chief Manager, Rsrtc Barmer Depot, Barmer, Rajasthan.

5.       Chief Manager, Rsrtc Bikaner Depot, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Avinash Acharya
For Respondent(s)            :     Ms. Kamini Chauhan



                    HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order

19/02/2026

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with following

prayers:-

"(i) The writ petition may kindly be allowed.

(Uploaded on 19/02/2026 at 01:43:42 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:9133] (2 of 3) [CW-4124/2026]

(ii) The respondents may kindly be directed to count the seniority of the petitioners from the date of their initial appointment.

(iii) The respondents may kindly be directed to include the period of probation of 3 years in regular service for the purpose of granting 1st and 2nd ACP benefits to the petitioners with all consequential benefits including seniority, annual grade increments, promotion etc;

(iv) The respondents may kindly be directed to grant the Ist & 2nd ACP benefits to the petitioners on completion of 9 & 18 years of service counting their seniority from the date of initial appointment and modify the orders to that extent, if already been issued by the respondent.

(v) The respondents may kindly be directed to grant due arrears to the petitioners along with interest @ 18% p.a.;

(vi) Quash and set aside the impugned order dt. 21.5.2004 (Ann.4)

(vii) Any other appropriate direction or order which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted. "

2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners while

referring order dated 03.05.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.

6074/2023 titled as "Bhanwar Nath and Ors. Vs. Rajasthan

State Road Transport Corporation & Ors" decided by a Co-ordinate

Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur submits that the petitioners may be

granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the

respondents-Authority to consider and resolve their grievances in light

to ratio decided on 25.01.2017 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.

8810/2014 "Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport

Corporation & Anr."

3. Learned counsel for the respondent is not in a position to refute the

same.

4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a

liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a

period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are

directed to decide the representation in light of ratio as laid down in

case of Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport

(Uploaded on 19/02/2026 at 01:43:42 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:9133] (3 of 3) [CW-4124/2026]

Corporation (supra), and relied in case of Bhanwar Nath and

Ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (supra). In

case of deviation, the respondents are directed to decide the

representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30

days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the

respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the

petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners

have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still

aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.

5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending

application, if any, stands disposed of.

(DR.NUPUR BHATI),J

surabhii/206-

(Uploaded on 19/02/2026 at 01:43:42 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter