Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Deepak Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:6322)
2026 Latest Caselaw 1678 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1678 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2026

[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Deepak Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:6322) on 4 February, 2026

Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2026:RJ-JD:6322]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 460/2026

Deepak Sharma S/o Shri Babu Lal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
Main Road, Bramano Ka Bas, Village Falka, Block Jaitaran District
Beawar
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
         Of Home Affairs, Secretariat, Jaipur
2.       Director     General         Of       Police,        Rajasthan,      Police
         Headquarters, Jaipur
3.       Inspector    General       Of     Police,      Ajmer       Range,    Ajmer
         Rajasthan
4.       Superintendent Of Police, Disrict Beawar, Rajasthan
5.       Station House Officer, Sho, Police Station Anandpur Kalu
         Block Jaitaran, District Beawar
                                                                   ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Jitendra Choudhary
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, AGA



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

04/02/2026

1. By way of filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner is

seeking following prayers:-

"I. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, including

a writ of Certiorari and/or Mandamus, quashing and setting

aside the Police Verification Report dated 27.08.2024

(Verification No.4865871), insofar as it reflects the juvenile

(Uploaded on 05/02/2026 at 06:38:55 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:6322] (2 of 5) [CRLW-460/2026]

incident of the year 2016 and labels the petitioner as having

"Criminal Antecedents";

II. Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent

Authorities to forthwith expunge, erase and delete all

reference to the juvenile case of the year 2016 (FIR

No.111/2016, Police Station Anandpur Kalu, District Pali)

from the police records, CCTNS database, and all connected

digital and physical repositories, in strict compliance with

Section 24 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of

Children) Act, 2015;

III. Direct the Respondent Authorities to issue a fresh Police

Verification Certificate in favour of the Petitioner, clearly

reflecting "No Criminal Record/No Criminal Case Found",

within a time-bound manner, so as to enable the petitioner

to pursue employment and livelihood without any unlawful

stigma;

IV Declare that the action of the Respondent Authorities in

disclosing and relying upon a juvenile record for the purpose

of adult police verification is illegal, arbitrary,

unconstitutional, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the

Constitution of India, as well as contrary to the mandate of

the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015".

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and gone

through the averments made in the writ petition.

3. The petitioner was juvenile at the time of commission of

crime. He was charge-sheeted for the offence under Section

(Uploaded on 05/02/2026 at 06:38:55 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:6322] (3 of 5) [CRLW-460/2026]

4/25 of the Arms Act. Vide order dated 25.04.2017, he

pleaded guilty for the above offence and was ordered to

deposit a fine of Rs.200/- under Section 15(d) of Juvenile

Justice Act,2000.

4. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was a juvenile at the

time of the alleged incident and that the proceedings

culminated in a minor disposition under the Juvenile Justice

Act. The material on record further reflects that after the

said incident, the petitioner has reformed himself, completed

his education up to Class XII, and is presently seeking

employment to earn his livelihood.

5. The action of the respondent authorities in reflecting the

juvenile incident of the year 2016 in the Police Verification

Report dated 27.08.2024, branding the petitioner as having

"criminal antecedents", is patently illegal and stigmatic. In

the present socio-economic framework, a clean police

verification certificate is a sine qua non for securing

employment. Disclosure of a juvenile record has the effect of

permanently excluding the petitioner from the organised

workforce, thereby directly infringing his fundamental right

to livelihood, which is an integral facet of the right to life and

dignity guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of

India.

6. Such disclosure is also in the teeth of the very object and

spirit of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children)

Act, 2015, which is founded on the principles of reform,

(Uploaded on 05/02/2026 at 06:38:55 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:6322] (4 of 5) [CRLW-460/2026]

rehabilitation, and social reintegration. Section 3(xiv) of the

Act embodies the "Principle of Fresh Start", mandating that

all past records of a child in conflict with law shall be erased,

save in exceptional circumstances. Section 24 of the Act

further grants complete protection against any

disqualification attaching to a juvenile offence and casts a

corresponding obligation upon the State to ensure that such

records are not preserved or relied upon to the detriment of

the individual in adulthood.

7. A Division Bench of this Court in State of Rajasthan v.

Bhawani Shankar Moorh [2023/RJJD/002510] has

categorically held that juvenile records are not only

protected from disclosure but are required to be destroyed,

and that any disqualification arising therefrom must be

completely ignored. The continued retention and display of

the petitioner's juvenile record in the CCTNS database and

police verification report is, therefore, in clear violation of the

statutory mandate and judicial command.

8. The legal position now stands conclusively settled by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lokesh Kumar v. State of

Chhattisgarh & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No. 1069/2025],

wherein it has been held that disclosure of juvenile

convictions in character or police verification certificates,

particularly where it impacts future employment, manifestly

undermines the legislative safeguards under the Juvenile

Justice law. The Apex Court has further issued a binding

(Uploaded on 05/02/2026 at 06:38:55 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:6322] (5 of 5) [CRLW-460/2026]

direction that such juvenile records shall not be disclosed or

relied upon in any verification, screening, or certification

process by the police or any public authority.

9. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is allowed and

impugned Police Verification Report dated 27.08.2024,

insofar as it discloses the petitioner's juvenile record and

labels him as having criminal antecedents, is declared not

sustainable in law. The continued existence of such entry

operates as a permanent stigma, defeats the reformative

purpose of the Juvenile Justice legislation, and unjustly clogs

the petitioner's career prospects.

10. Consequently, this Court is of the considered opinion

that the petitioner is entitled to complete erasure of the

juvenile record from all police and digital databases, and

directs issuance of a fresh Police Verification Certificate to

him reflecting no criminal record, so as to enable him to lead

a life of dignity and self-reliance.

11. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(FARJAND ALI),J 15-divya/-

(Uploaded on 05/02/2026 at 06:38:55 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter