Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dinesh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:40681)
2025 Latest Caselaw 13060 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 13060 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Dinesh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:40681) on 11 September, 2025

Author: Nupur Bhati
Bench: Nupur Bhati
[2025:RJ-JD:40681]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                   S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6801/2024

Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Kishan Dan Rao, Aged About 54 Years,
Resident Of Village Lundara, Post Malanu, Via Nana, Tehsil Bali,
District Pali.
                                                                         ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
         Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
         (Panchayati      Raj),      Government           Of        Rajasthan,   Jaipur,
         Rajasthan.
2.       Additional      Commissioner,             Rural       Development            And
         Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
         Jaipur.
3.       Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Barmer, Rajasthan.
4.       Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Chouhtan,
         District Barmer, Rajasthan.
                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :    Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla


                 HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order 11/09/2025

1. Petition herein arises, inter alia, out of the inaction on the

part of the respondents in not according the correct service and

notional benefits to the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset submits that

qua the aforesaid grievance, the petitioners may be granted

liberty to file a fresh representation before the competent

authority and the same be decided by passing appropriate

administrative orders, in accordance with law.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners also relies on

order/judgment in Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. v. The State

(Uploaded on 11/09/2025 at 06:21:20 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:40681] (2 of 2) [CW-6801/2024]

of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.12109/2018, decided on 18.07.2018 at Jaipur Bench and

submits that the respondents may be directed to consider the

representation of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid

judgment.

4. Request seems to be fair.

5. Given the nature of order which is being passed, no

prejudice would be caused to the respondents and, therefore, the

requirement of issuance of notice is dispensed with as no return is

required to be filed by them.

6. In the aforesaid premise, the writ petition is disposed of with

a liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation, which

shall be gone into by the competent authority and appropriate

administrative order shall be passed in accordance with law.

7. Needless to say that the competent authority shall go

through the judgment relied upon by learned counsel for the

petitioners as mentioned hereinabove and apply its independent

mind on the applicability of the same before passing any order.

8. Needful be done as expeditiously as possible.

(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J

117-/Devesh/-

(Uploaded on 11/09/2025 at 06:21:20 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter