Kiran vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:51603)
2025 Latest Caselaw 16228 Raj

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Kiran vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:51603) on 27 November, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur

Bench: Kuldeep Mathur

[2025:RJ-JD:51603]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2989/2025

1.       Kiran D/o Shri Prahlad Ram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o
         Vill- Gram Tarnau, Teh.-Jayal, Distt.-Nagaur.
2.       Vijay Pal S/o Lala Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vill-
         Riddi, Teh- Sri Dungargarh, Distt- Bikaner.
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
         Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,
         Jaipur.
2.       The Superintendent Of Police, Bikaner.
3.       The Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur.
4.       The S.h.o., P.s.. Sri Balaji, Nagaur.
5.       The S.h.o., P.s. Sri Dungargarh, Bikaner.
6.       Nawal S/o Prakash Bhargav, R/o Vill -Gram Tarnau, Teh -
         Jayal, Distt - Nagaur.
7.       Ramu Ram S/o Sugana Ram Bhargav, R/o Vill -Gram
         Tarnau, Teh -Jayal, Distt - Nagaur.
8.       Jagdish S/o Sugana Ram Bhargav, R/o Vill -Gram Tarnau,
         Teh -Jayal, Distt - Nagaur.
9.       Bhikha Ram S/o Sugana Ram Bhargav, R/o Vill -Gram
         Tarnau, Teh -Jayal, Distt - Nagaur.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Adu Ram Jat.
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Hathi Singh Jodha, PP.



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

27/11/2025

1. The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

(Uploaded on 27/11/2025 at 06:00:19 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:51603] (2 of 2) [CRLW-2989/2025]

2. The petitioners both being major persons, claim to be in a

live in relationship. They submit that they are living with each

other against the wishes of their parents and thus, they

apprehend threat to their lives at the hands of private

respondents. The petitioners allegedly approached the respondent

police authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate

protection but no heed has been paid to the request so far.

3. The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

live-in-relationship agreement have been filed on record. Thus,

taking cue from the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in

AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners for

directing the Superintendent of Police/Commissioner of Police

concerned to provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be

accepted.

4. The Superintendent of Police/Commissioner of Police

concerned shall have the matter enquired into and if so required,

appropriate protection shall be provided to the petitioners as and

when warranted. The Superintendent of Police/Commissioner of

Police concerned shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.

5. The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 676-Tikam/-

(Uploaded on 27/11/2025 at 06:00:19 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)