Rubina vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:22600)
2025 Latest Caselaw 694 Raj

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Rubina vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:22600) on 9 May, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur

Bench: Kuldeep Mathur

[2025:RJ-JD:22600]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1317/2025

1.       Rubina, Aged About 21 Years, D/o Mohd. Sabir R/o Hakim
         Coloni, 5Th Road, Jodhpur, Dist. Jodhpur
2.       Kishan S/o Suresh Bhil, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Eklavya
         Bhil Basti, Ward No. 18, Shamshan Road, Pratap Nagar,
         Dist. Jodhpur
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
         Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Raj. Jaipur
2.       Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur,raj.
3.       Sho, P.s. Pratap Nagar, Dist. Jodhpur,raj.
4.       Mohd Shabir S/o Mohd Karim, R/o Hakim Coloni, 5Th
         Road, Jodhpur, Dist. Jodhpur
5.       Alka W/o Aasif, R/o Hakim Coloni, 5Th Road, Jodhpur,
         Dist. Jodhpur
6.       Mehrun, R/o Hakim Coloni, 5Th Road, Jodhpur, Dist.
         Jodhpur
7.       Irfan S/o Mohd Shabir, R/o Hakim Coloni, 5Th Road,
         Jodhpur, Dist. Jodhpur
8.       Asif S/o Mohd. Shabir, R/o Hakim Coloni, 5Th Road,
         Jodhpur, Dist. Jodhpur
9.       Aman S/o Mohd Shabir, R/o Hakim Coloni, 5Th Road,
         Jodhpur, Dist. Jodhpur
10.      Arif S/o Mohd. Shabir, R/o Hakim Coloni, 5Th Road,
         Jodhpur, Dist. Jodhpur
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Dayal Singh
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Narenda Singh Chandawat, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

09/05/2025

[2025:RJ-JD:22600] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1317/2025]

The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live

in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other

against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at

the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The

petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent

authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection

but no heed has been paid to their request so far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in

relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the

judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the

prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned

respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners

deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 214-himanshu/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)