Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 56 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:20937]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1206/2025
1. Kashish, D/o Uma Devi Resident Of Ward No 2 Surjit
Singh Colony Tehsil And District Sriganganagar Raj
2. Ashish Kumar Sharma S/o Rakesh Kumar, Aged About 44
Years, 6 L 32 Jawahar Nagar Tehsil And District
Sriganganagar
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Ministry Of Home
Affairs Jaipur
2. Superintendent Of Police, Sriganganagar Through
Government Advocate Rajasthan High Court Jodhpur
3. Station House Officer, Police Station Padampur District
Sriganganagar
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali District
Sriganganagar
5. Station House Officer, Police Station Jawahar Nagar
District Sriganganagar
6. Preeti Sharma D/o Jagdish Rai Tiwari, Ward No 11
Padampur Tehsil Padampur District Sriganganagar
7. Gagandeep Sharma S/o Jagdish Rai Tiwari, Ward No 11
Padampur Tehsil Padampur District Sriganganagar
8. Kamal Sharma S/o Jagdish Rai Tiwari, Ward No 11
Padampur Tehsil Padampur District Sriganganagar
9. Asha Rani Spouse/o Jagdish Rai Tiwari, Ward No 11
Padampur Tehsil Padampur District Sriganganagar
10. Jagdish Rai Tiwari, Ward No 11 Padampur Tehsil
Padampur District Sriganganagar
11. Chandra Mohan S/o Manoj Sharma, Resident Of 6 R 9
Jawahar Nagar Tehsil And District Sriganganagar Raj
12. Raja S/o Manoj Sharma, Resident Of 6 R 9 Jawahar Nagar
Tehsil And District Sriganganagar Raj
13. Manoj Sharma, Resident Of 6 R 9 Jawahar Nagar Tehsil
And District Sriganganagar Raj
----Respondents
(Downloaded on 01/05/2025 at 09:53:52 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:20937] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1206/2025]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Jagga
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lalit Kishore Sen, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
01/05/2025
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the
prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
[2025:RJ-JD:20937] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1206/2025]
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 281-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!