Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Singh Kumpawat vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 529 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 529 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ram Singh Kumpawat vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. ... on 7 May, 2025

Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:21842]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                     S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 545/2018

Ram Singh Kumpawat S/o Shri Narayan Singh Singh, aged about
58 years, Resident Of Plot No. 38, Mohan A, Bjs Colony, Paota,
Jodhpur. (Presently Working On Post Of Conductor In Abu Road
Depot)
                                                                          ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
1.       The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Ministry
         Of Transport, Transport Department, Jaipur.
2.       Chairman And Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road
         Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Choumu House,
         Jaipur.
3.       The Executive Director (Administration), Rajasthan State
         Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Choumu
         House, Jaipur Rajasthan.
4.       Chief Manager, Abu Road Depot Rsrtc, Abu Road.
                                                                       ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :    Mr. Avinash Acharya
For Respondent(s)              :    Ms. Kamini Chouhan



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

07/05/2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a

judgment of this Court rendered in S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.8810/2014 "Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road

Transport Corporation & Anr." decided on 25.01.2017 in the

following terms:-

[2025:RJ-JD:21842] (2 of 3) [CW-545/2018]

"Apparently, by effect of the above circular, benefit of second selection scale falling due to the petitioner could only have been deferred by two years and not more. In this background, the decision of the respondent Corporation to defer second selection scale admissible to the petitioner from 6.10.2008 to 6.10.2019 is totally unjustified, arbitrary and contrary to the circulars adopted by the Corporation. The impugned action of the respondents is thus quashed and struck down. The respondents shall extend the benefit of second selection scale to the petitioner by making a deferment of two years from the date of his actualentitlement. Monetary benefits flowing from the above direction shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of six months from today with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. In case, the payment is delayed beyond three months, the interest shall stand enhanced to 9% per annum and shall be recoverable from the official/s responsible for causing the delay if any.

The writ petition is allowed in these terms. No order as to costs."

3. Learned counsel further submits that the order dated

25.01.2017 was affirmed by the Division Bench in D.B. Civil

Special Appeal (Writ) No.524/2018 decided on 02.12.2021.

Against the order dated 02.12.2021 passed by the Division Bench

of this Court, a Special Leave Petition No.10330/2022 was

preferred before Hon'ble the Supreme Court and the same was

also dismissed vide judgment dated 13.07.2022.

4. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for the

petitioner submit that the petitioner may be permitted to file a

[2025:RJ-JD:21842] (3 of 3) [CW-545/2018]

representation before the respondents, who shall consider the

same in light of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case

of Tara Chand (supra).

5. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for

the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a

direction that in the event of filing a representation by the

petitioners, the respondent shall decide the same within a period

of four weeks from the date of its receipt; if the case of the

petitioner falls within the purview of the law laid down by this

Court in the case of Tara Chand (supra); the same shall be

decided in terms of the judgment above.

6. Stay petition also stands disposed of.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 268-Payal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter