Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 349 Raj
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:21532]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1240/2025
1. Suman D/o Lumba Ram, Aged About 21 Years, Resident
Of Devasiyon Ka Bas, Mandala, Pali (Raj.) At Present 229,
Raiko Ka Bas, Giradra, Khalsa, Pali (Raj).
2. Laxman S/o Laburam, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of
229, Raiko Ka Bas, Giradra, Khalsa, Pali (Raj).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary Ministry Of
Home Affairs, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Pali , Raj
3. Sho, P.s. Sojat , Dist Pali
4. Sho, P.s. Sadar Dist Pali
5. Lamba Ram S/o Hira Ram, Resident Of Devasiyon Ka Bas.
Mandala, Pali (Raj.).
6. Mahendra S/o Vanna Ram, Resident Of Kharodi, Jetaran
Biyawar (Raj.).
7. Mularam S/o Vanna Ram, Resident Of Kharodi, Jetaran
Biyawar (Raj.).
8. Arjun Ram S/o Hira Ram, Resident Of Devasiyon Ka Bas.
Mandala, Pali (Raj.).
9. Meera Devi Spouse/o Lumba Ram, Resident Of Devasiyon
Ka Bas. Mandala, Pali (Raj.).
10. Seeta Devi W/o Vanna Ram, Resident Of Devasiyon Ka
Bas. Mandala, Pali (Raj.).
11. Tara Ram S/o Vanna Ram, Resident Of Kharodi, Jetaran
Biyawar (Raj.).
12. Laxman S/o Vanna Ram, Resident Of Kharodi, Jetaran
Biyawar (Raj.).
13. Nimba Ram S/o Khimji, Resident Of Village Lambiya,
Jetaran, Biyawar (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akash Goyal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
(Downloaded on 06/05/2025 at 09:38:19 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:21532] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1240/2025]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
05/05/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to have
performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was
performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel
threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are
their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned
respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with
adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so
far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed
on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners
for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide
protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 248-himanshu/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!