Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1623 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:28345]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1908/2025
1. Mamta Patel D/o Rana Ram, Aged About 19 Years, Patelo
Ka Bas Narnadi District Jodhpur
2. Santosh Depan S/o Daya Ram Depan, Aged About 38
Years, Bheem Dal Vyamshala Kaga Road Meghwal Basti
Nagori Gate Jodhpur
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Chief Secretary Ministry Of Home
Affairs Jaipur
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Jodhpur Rural
3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Boranada
Jodhpur
4. Rana Ram S/o Dhana Ram, Patelo Ka Bas Narnadi Dist
Jodhpur
5. Dungar Ram S/o Dhana Ram, Patelo Ka Bas Narnadi Dist
Jodhpur
6. Praveen S/o Rana Ram, Patelo Ka Bas Narnadi Dist
Jodhpur
7. Amra Ram S/o Jagga Ram, Patelo Ka Bas Narnadi Dist
Jodhpur
8. Bala Ram S/o Taru Ram, Patelo Ka Bas Narnadi Dist
Jodhpur
9. Ravindra S/o Bala Ram, Patelo Ka Bas Narnadi Dist
Jodhpur
10. Kuldeep S/o Mohan Ram, Patelo Ka Bas Narnadi Dist
Jodhpur
11. Rukmo W/o Jaga Ram, Patelo Ka Bas Narnadi Dist
Jodhpur
12. Seeta W/o Rana Ram, Patelo Ka Bas Narnadi Dist Jodhpur
13. Pempa W/o Achla Ram, Patelo Ka Bas Narnadi Dist
Jodhpur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avinash Bhati
(Downloaded on 02/07/2025 at 09:43:01 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:28345] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1908/2025]
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
01/07/2025
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the
prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
[2025:RJ-JD:28345] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1908/2025]
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 237-himanshu/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!