Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6754 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 February, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:7842]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3544/2025
Dhanna Ram Meghwal S/o Dhaglaram Meghwal, Aged About 50
Years, Resident Of 848, Nayapura Mohalla, Anandpur Kalu,
District Pali, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,
Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, District
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
3. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, District
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
4. The District Education Office Elementary / Secondary
Education, Pali, Rajasthan.
5. The Joint Director, (School Education) Pali Division, Pali,
Rajasthan.
6. The District Education Office Elementary / Secondary
Education, Beawer, Rajasthan.
7. The Joint Director, (School Education) Beawer Division,
Beawer, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ratan Ankiya.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
07/02/2025
1. Petitioner herein is before this Court seeking directions to the
respondents to give notional benefits and seniority as was given to
his counter-parts, on the post of Teacher Gr.III, pursuant to the
advertisement in question.
[2025:RJ-JD:7842] (2 of 2) [CW-3544/2025]
2. At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is
covered an order dated 16.07.2014 passed by the Jaipur Bench of
this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7283/2014 : Manoj
Khandelwal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. He submits
that the petitioner is sanguine that, in case she is allowed to file a
representation qua the grievance raised in the present writ
petition and the same is considered in light of the aforesaid
judgment, she will be meted out with favorable treatment.
3. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits
of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with
a direction to the competent authority to decide the
representation (may file fresh, if not already filed) of the
petitioner, in accordance with law, keeping in view the
observations made in the case of Manoj Khandelwal (supra), as
expeditiously as possible.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA),J 60-Sumit/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!