Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6418 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:6673]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 442/2025
Murti Devi W/o Om Prakash, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Ward No.
02, Deshali, 3-4 Rsm, Tehsil Gharsana, Dist. Sriganganagar,raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Saeena Bano
Mr. Sampat Prajapat
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, Dy.GA
Mr. R.S. Bhati, AGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
03/02/2025
1. By way of filing of the instant criminal miscellaneous petition,
challenge has been made to the order dated 23.12.2024 passed
by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases, Bikaner in Criminal
Misc. Case No.629/2024 pertaining to FIR No.165/2024 registered
at the Police Station Chhatargarh, District Bikaner, whereby the
prayer made by the petitioner for releasing the vehicle in question
(Swift Desire) bearing registration No. RJ-13-CB-2988, has been
declined.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is the
registered owner of the vehicle in question which has been seized
by the Police Officers. He submits that the petitioner being the
owner of the vehicle in question, is the person best entitled to get
[2025:RJ-JD:6673] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-442/2025]
back the possession of the seized property. There is no other
person claiming supurdagi of the same.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the miscellaneous
petition.
4. Considering the submissions and following the judgment
rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in
AIR 2003 SC 638 and the order dated 18.11.2022 passed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 2005/2022 [SLP
(Crl.) No.7280/2022) titled as Sainaba Vs. The State of Kerala
& Anr., wherein, the vehicle involved in a crime under NDPS Act
was directed to be released on terms and conditions to be
determined by the Special Court, the instant miscellaneous
petition is allowed and this Court deems it just and appropriate to
release the vehicle in question in favour of the petitioner on
interim custody till conclusion of the trial provided he furnishes a
Supurdaginama of Rs. 3,50,000/- and surety of like amount to the
satisfaction of the Court below.
(FARJAND ALI),J 123-Rakesh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!