Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kishan Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:55187)
2025 Latest Caselaw 17283 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 17283 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2025

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Kishan Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:55187) on 18 December, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:55187]

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                        JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                                 No. 2262/2025

                                          In

            S.B. Criminal Misc. Appeal (SB) No.2693/2025

Kishan Singh S/o Nain Singh, Aged About 43 Years, Village
Mokalsar, Tehsil Siwana, District Barmer, Rajasthan (Lodged In
Central Jail, Jodhpur)
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
State of Rajasthan, through CBI
                                                                    ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Bhanwar Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

18/12/2025

Heard learned counsel for the applicant-appellant and

learned Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of

sentences.

Drawing attention of the Court towards the impugned

judgment dated 24.11.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge,

CBI, Jodhpur Metropolitan in Special Sessions Case No.03/2018

(CIS No.03/2018), learned counsel for the appellant submitted

that learned trial Court in its judgment has failed to appreciate the

statements of prosecution witnesses in their true and correct

manner. From the perusal of the statements of the prosecution

witnesses, it is apparent that no case against the petitioner is

made out. There are major contradictions, omissions and

(Uploaded on 19/12/2025 at 11:16:59 AM)

[2025:RJ-JD:55187] (2 of 3) [SOSA-2262/2025]

improvements in the prosecution witnesses. Apart from the above

ground, there are other strong grounds available to the appellant

for assailing the impugned judgment of conviction and therefore,

the sentences awarded to the appellant deserve to be suspended,

during pendency of the appeal.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the arguments

advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant and submitted

that it is not a fit case for suspending the sentences awarded to

the accused appellant.

Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at bar and

having regard to the facts and circumstances as available on the

record, particularly the fact that the hearing of the appeal is likely

to consume time, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for

suspending the sentences awarded to the accused appellant

during the pendency of the instant appeal.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 430 BNSS (389 Cr.P.C.) is allowed and it is ordered

that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS

Cases, District Sri Ganganagar vide judgment dated 24.11.2025 in

Special Sessions Case No.03/2018 (CIS No.03/2018) against the

appellant-applicant Kishan Singh S/o Nain Singh, shall remain

suspended till the final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he

shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in

the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to

the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

Court on 21.01.2026 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

(Uploaded on 19/12/2025 at 11:16:59 AM)

[2025:RJ-JD:55187] (3 of 3) [SOSA-2262/2025]

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

Court for cancellation of bail.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 69-tarunGoyal/-

(Uploaded on 19/12/2025 at 11:16:59 AM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter