Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9711 Raj
Judgement Date : 20 August, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:37448]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1159/2004
Smt. Lalita Vaishnav
----Appellant
Versus
M/s Royal City Cable
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Suprabh Mehta for
Mr. Sandeep Saruparia
For Respondent(s) : -----
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Judgment
20/08/2025
1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the impugned
order dated 07.07.2004 passed by the learned District and
Sessions Judge, Rajsamand under Section 9 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act of 1996') was in force
only upto the filing of application under Section 34 of the Act of
1996. Since the limitation period for filing the application has
already got over way back in the year 2004 itself and the
impugned order dated 07.07.2004 has ceased to be operative, the
instant civil misc. appeal has become infructuous.
2. The instant civil misc. appeal is dismissed accordingly.
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J 23-Ravi Khandelwal
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!