Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Sukhpal Kaur vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:36759) on 18 August, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:36759]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5401/2025
1. Sukhpal Kaur W/o Shamsher Singh, Aged About 70 Years,
Resident Of 43 Gg, Kharla, Sri Karanpur, District
Sriganganagar (Rajasthan)
2. Satnam Singh S/o Shamsher Singh, Aged About 44 Years,
Resident Of 43 Gg, Kharla, Sri Karanpur, District
Sriganganagar (Rajasthan)
3. Manjinder Singh S/o Satnam Singh, Aged About 20 Years,
Resident Of 43 Gg, Kharla, Sri Karanpur, District
Sriganganagar (Rajasthan)
4. Malkit Kaur W/o Mejar Singh, Aged About 75 Years,
Resident Of 43 Gg, Kharla, Sri Karanpur, District
Sriganganagar (Rajasthan)
5. Kuldeep Singh S/o Mejar Singh, Aged About 57 Years,
Resident Of 43 Gg, Kharla, Sri Karanpur, District
Sriganganagar (Rajasthan)
6. Gurmeet Kaur D/o Mejar Singh, Aged About 54 Years,
Resident Of 43 Gg, Kharla, Sri Karanpur, District
Sriganganagar (Rajasthan)
7. Rajvinder Kaur D/o Mejar Singh, Aged About 52 Years,
Resident Of 43 Gg, Kharla, Sri Karanpur, District
Sriganganagar (Rajasthan)
8. Shamsher Singh S/o Mejar Singh, Aged About 50 Years,
Resident Of 43 Gg, Kharla, Sri Karanpur, District
Sriganganagar (Rajasthan)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Jeet Singh S/o Daman Singh, Resident Of 43 Gg, Kharla,
Sri Karanpur, District Sriganganagar (Rajasthan)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sriram Choudhary, PP
(Downloaded on 20/08/2025 at 09:47:44 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:36759] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-5401/2025]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
18/08/2025
1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the
petitioners does not want to press the instant criminal misc.
petition. However, he seeks liberty for the petitioners to submit a
representation to the concerned Superintendent of Police with
appropriate directions to decide the same and issue necessary
instructions to the concerned Investigating Officer.
2. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is disposed of
as not pressed with liberty to the petitioners to submit a detailed
representation to the concerned Superintendent of Police averring
therein all the grounds which have been raised in this petition
within a period of 07 days from the date of receipt of a copy of
this order.
3. In the event, the representation is submitted, the concerned
Superintendent of Police is directed to minutely and objectively
consider the contents of the same and thereafter, issue necessary
instructions to the Investigating Officer. All the relevant
documents with the representation shall also be taken into
consideration. The representation shall be decided within a period
of 30 days from the date of receipt of the same. The parties will
be at liberty to approach this Court again, if grievance arises.
4. Till 30 days from the date of filing of representation, the
petitioners shall not be arrested in connection with FIR
No.117/2025, registered at the Police Station Srikaranpur, District
Sriganganagar.
[2025:RJ-JD:36759] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-5401/2025]
5. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under
Section 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(A) of BNS. Thus, the
provisions contained under Section 35 of BNSS (Sections 41 and
41A of the CrPC) are applicable mutatis mutandis and the
judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar [AIR 2014 SC 2756] applies
squarely in the present case, therefore, it is deemed appropriate
to direct the investigating officer that in the event, the offences
are found to be proved and the arrest of the petitioners is
absolutely necessary, then instead of affecting arrest at once, a
prior notice of 15 days shall be given to the petitioners. Further
the petitioners shall also be at liberty to raise all permissible
objections and issues before the trial court at the appropriate
stage of proceedings
6. Stay petition also stands disposed of.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
85-Hanuman/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
