Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shrenik Daga vs Union Of India (2025:Rj-Jd:17423)
2025 Latest Caselaw 11032 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11032 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Shrenik Daga vs Union Of India (2025:Rj-Jd:17423) on 3 April, 2025

Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:17423]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4459/2025

Shrenik Daga S/o Shri Hukam Chand, Aged About 40 Years,
Resident Of A-31, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur (Raj.).
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Road,
         Transport And Highway, Government Of India, New Delhi.
2.       The Chairman, National Highway Authority Of India, G-5
         And 6, Sector 10, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110075.
3.       The Prescribed Authority (Land Acquisition) And Sub
         Divisional Officer, Rohet, Pali, District Pali, Rajasthan.
4.       The Project Director And Executive Engineer, Public Works
         Department, National Highway Block, Pali (Raj.).
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Pradeep Swami.
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Aishwarya Anand.



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

03/04/2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the

controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely

covered by a judgment of even date rendered by this Court in S.B.

Civil Writ Petition No.4837/2025 (Sunil Sancheti Vs. Union

of India & Ors.) in the following terms:-

"11. In these circumstances, this Court is firmly of the view that the petitioner is duly entitled for grant of solatium and interest for acquisition of his land by the respondents. However, since the dispute has not been raised before the Land Acquisition Officer, therefore, it will be in the interest of justice that the

[2025:RJ-JD:17423] (2 of 2) [CW-4459/2025]

petitioner may be given liberty to approach the Land Acquisition Officer for grant of solatium and interest as per law in the light of the law laid-down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Tarsem Singh (supra).

12. In view of the discussions made above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned Land Acquisition Officer by way of filing an appropriate application for grant of solatium and interest and the Land Acquisition Officer is directed to decide the said application expeditiously, after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, by passing a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such application.

13. It is made clear that the respondents will be at liberty to raise all the grounds available to them including the ground of delay in filing such application.

14. The stay application as well as other pending misc. applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly."

3. In view of the submissions made before this Court, the

present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment

rendered by this Court in the case of Sunil Sancheti (supra).

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J C-2-Shahenshah/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter