Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dinesh Kumar Meghwal vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 8327 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8327 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Dinesh Kumar Meghwal vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 21 September, 2024

Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur

Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur

[2024:RJ-JD:39192]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15406/2024

Dinesh Kumar Meghwal S/o Prabharam Meghwal, Aged About 40
Years, Kailash Nagar, Tehsil Sheoganj, District Sirohi (Rajasthan)
                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.       The    State      Of     Rajasthan,         Through        The   Secretary,
         Department Of School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       Secretary,      Rural      Development            And      Panchayati   Raj
         Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3.       Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
4.       District Collector, Sirohi.
5.       The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Sirohi.
6.       District Education Officer (Elementary), Sirohi.
7.       President,      School         Development             And    Management
         Committee (Sdmc), Kailash Nagar, Panchayat Samiti
         Sheoganj, Sirohi.
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Ratish Bhatnagar
For Respondent(s)            :



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

21/09/2024

1. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the

petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is

covered by an order passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court

in the case of Subhash Chander Vs. State of Rajasthan &

Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12299/2017, decided on

27.11.2017. He submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if a

liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the respondent

authorities by way of filing a representation for redressal of his

[2024:RJ-JD:39192] (2 of 2) [CW-15406/2024]

grievance and the respondent authorities may be directed to

consider and decide the same at the earliest in the light of

judgment rendered by this Court in Subhash Chander's case

(supra).

2. In view of the submissions made, without commenting on the

merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed

of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the

aforesaid representations of the petitioner, in accordance with law,

keeping in view the observations made in the case of Subhash

Chander (supra), within a period of thirty days from the date of

receipt of copy of this order.

3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 9-SanjayS/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter