Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8117 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 September, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:38420]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15201/2024
1. Kailash Puri S/o Shri Anand Puri, Aged About 53 Years,
Resident Of Than Mata Hinglaj, Post Guda Naal, Tehsil
Siwana, District Balotra, Rajasthan.
2. Aimad Singh S/o Shri Udai Singh, Aged About 44 Years,
Resident Of - Mukam Post Dheera, Tehsil Siwana, District
Balotra, Rajasthan.
3. Lalveer Singh S/o Shri Agar Singh, Aged About 36 Years,
Resident Of - Kerala, Tehsil Shergarh, District Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
4. Bhakar Singh S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 43
Years, Resident Of Gram Panchayat Saba, Tehsil
Shergarh, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
5. Hadmat Singh S/o Shri Ram Singh, Aged About 48 Years,
At Present Working At - Panchayat Samiti Girha, District
Barmer, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Rural
Development And Panchayati Raj Department,
Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Zila Parishad Barmer, Through Its Chief Executive
Officer, Barmer, Rajasthan.
3. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Siwana,
District Balotra, Rajasthan.
4. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Girha,
District Balotra, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Singh Rathore.
(Downloaded on 18/09/2024 at 08:57:18 PM)
[2024:RJ-JD:38420] (2 of 3) [CW-15201/2024]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
18/09/2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely
covered by a judgment dated 21.08.2024 rendered by this Court
in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.472/2023 (Bimla Vs. State of
Rajasthan & Ors.).
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that although the
provisional seniority list has been published inviting objections
from the probable candidates and the petitioners have also
furnished the objections to the provisional seniority list published
by the respondents but the same is not being considered in
consonance with the provisions of law. He, therefore, prays that
the respondents may be directed to consider the objections
furnished by the petitioners in light of the judgment rendered by
this Court in the case of Bimla (supra), the provisions of
Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 and the other relevant
notifications issued by the State Government.
4. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for
the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of with a
direction to the respondents to consider the objections filed by the
petitioners on the provisional seniority list strictly in accordance
with law keeping in mind the provisions of Rajasthan Panchayati
Raj Rules, 1996, the judgment rendered by this Court in the case
[2024:RJ-JD:38420] (3 of 3) [CW-15201/2024]
of Bimla (supra) and the other relevant notifications issued by the
State Government.
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 68-AnilSingh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!