Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Leeladhar vs Nanduram (2024:Rj-Jd:37979)
2024 Latest Caselaw 8041 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8041 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Leeladhar vs Nanduram (2024:Rj-Jd:37979) on 12 September, 2024

Author: Rekha Borana

Bench: Rekha Borana

[2024:RJ-JD:37979]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17907/2023

Leeladhar S/o Shri Utmaram Garg, Aged About 75 Years, Gadisar
Road, Jaisalmer.
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
Nanduram S/o Shri Chunaram Nai, Fatehgarh Hall, Jaisalmer
(Raj.).
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Prashant Tatia with
                                Mr. Rajat Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Rameshwar Lal Dave



              HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA

Order

12/09/2024

1. The present writ petition has been preferred against the

order dated 26.10.2023 passed by the Appellate Rent Tribunal,

Jaisalmer in Civil appeal No.01/2018 whereby the appeal as

preferred by the petitioner-defendant-landlord against the order

dated 24.01.2018 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Jaislamer in Rent

Case No.05/2016 has been rejected.

2. Vide order dated 24.01.2018, Rent Tribunal, Jaisalmer

proceeded on to allow the application under Sections 11 & 12 of

the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 read with Section 6 of the

Specific Relief Act, 1963 as preferred on behalf of the respondent-

plaintiff-tenant. Vide the said order, learned Rent Tribunal directed

the petitioner-defendant-landlord to handover the possession of

the shop in question to the respondent-plaintiff-tenant with

immediate effect.

[2024:RJ-JD:37979] (2 of 3) [CW-17907/2023]

Vide the said order, the petitioner-defendant-landlord was

also directed to pay an amount @ Rs.13,250/- per month for the

period of July 2016 to January 2018 to the respondent-plaintiff-

tenant, as compensation. With the said directions, the certificate

for possession was issued by the Rent Tribunal in favour of the

respondent-plaintiff-tenant.

3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the

petitioner sought time to complete his instructions and post lunch,

on instructions, sought permission to withdraw the present

petition qua the decree of possession with a proposal that the

decree for compensation as granted by the Rent Tribunal be set

aside, the same having been passed in excess of jurisdiction.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-plaintiff-

tenant does not object to the same and agreed that the

respondent-plaintiff-tenant is ready to waive his claim for

compensation if the possession of the premise in question is

handed over to him within a reasonable period.

5. In view of the submissions made and in view of the consent

given by learned counsel for the respondent, the impugned

judgment and decree dated 24.01.2018 passed by Rent Tribunal,

Jaisalmer and 26.10.2023 passed by Appellate Rent Tribunal,

Jaisalmer are hereby quashed and set aside to the extent of costs/

suit expenses and the compensation amount as awarded in favour

of the respondent-plaintiff-tenant at the rate of Rs.13,250/- per

month. The decree/possession certificate qua possession as

granted in favour of the respondent-plaintiff-tenant is hereby,

affirmed.

[2024:RJ-JD:37979] (3 of 3) [CW-17907/2023]

6. As agreed between both the parties, the petitioner-

defendant-landlord shall hand over the possession of the shop in

question measuring 9x10 sq. ft. to the respondent-plaintiff-tenant

within a period of two months from now. The said possession

would be handed over free from all encumbrances. The petitioner-

defendant-landlord shall not obstruct the peaceful user of the

property in question and shall not dispossess the respondent-

plaintiff-tenant without adopting due process of law. The

respondent-plaintiff-tenant shall however, be under an obligation

to continue pay the monthly rent as agreed between the parties.

7. It is made clear that if the peaceful and vacant possession of

the shop in question is not handed over to the respondent-plaintiff

-tenant within a period of two months from now, besides the

expedite execution of the decree/certificate in normal course, the

respondent-plaintiff-tenant shall also be entitled to invoke the

contempt jurisdiction of this Court.

8. On the above terms, the present writ petition is disposed

of.

9. Stay petition and all pending applications, if any, stand

disposed of.

(REKHA BORANA),J

810-devanshi/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter