Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9258 Raj
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:43257]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16949/2024
1. Sushil Kumar S/o Shri Shivkaran Ram, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Dodiyana, Tehsil Riyan Badi, District Nagaur (Raj.)
Belt No. 1683).
2. Mahendra Kilak S/o Shri Durga Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
Village Pundlota, Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur (Raj.) Belt No.
2213).
3. Shiv Karan Didwania S/o Shri Sukhdev Didwania, Aged About
32 Years, R/o Village Mangliyawas, Tehsil Pisagan, District
Ajmer (Raj.) Belt No. 2568.
4. Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Teja Ram Choudhary, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Village Gali No. 2, Kabir Nagar, Lohagal Ajmer
(Raj.) Belt No. 2171.
5. Manohar Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Ram Lal Gurjar, Aged About 33
Years, R/o Village Cahhatari, Post Gagawana, District Ajmer
(Raj.) Belt No. 2622
6. Manohar Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
Village And Post Rora, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner, (Raj.)
Belt No. 1130
7. Vani Gopal S/o Shri Sua Lal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Pratap
Nagar, Ajmer (Raj.) Belt No. 2577
8. N. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Nemi Chand Jangid, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Village Butati, Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur (Raj.)
Belt No. 995
9. Sanwar Mal S/o Shri Rambakash Vishnoi, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Village Damboi Khurd, Tehsil Makrana, District
Nagaur (Kuchaman-Didwana) (Raj.) Belt No. 1941
10. Manraj Choudhary S/o Shri Nand Lal Choudhary, Aged About
31 Years, R/o Bangro Ki Dhani Shalemabad, District Ajmer
(Raj.) Belt No. 2746
11. Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Mohan Lal Yadav, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Krishna Nagar Kolida, Tehsil Sikar, District Sikar
(Raj.) Belt No. 1327
12. Ravindra Yadav S/o Shri Ramphal Yadav, Aged About 33 Years,
R/o A-105 Sanjay Nagar, Bharatpur (Raj.) Belt No. 2787
13. Sharwan S/o Birbal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Sinod,
Tehsil Nagaur, District Nagaur (Raj.) Belt No. 2619
(Downloaded on 22/10/2024 at 09:54:00 PM)
[2024:RJ-JD:43257] (2 of 4) [CW-16949/2024]
14. Sharda Bhakar D/o Shri Nema Ram Bhakar, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Village Hanumanpura, Tehsil Kuchaman City,
District Didwana-Kuchaman (Raj.) Belt No. 2671
15. Santosh Bajya D/o Shri Sukh Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
Village Bikharniya, Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur (Raj.) Belt
No. 2740
16. Kamlesh Choudhary S/o Shri Mota Ram Beniwal, Aged About
31 Years, R/o Village Kurara, Tehsil Parabatsar, District
Didwana - Kuchaman (Raj.) Belt No. 2736
17. Garima Kumari Jat D/o Shri Ghasi Ram Jat, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Village Pathraj Kalan, Tehsil Todraisingh, District
Tonk (Raj.) Belt No. 2747
18. Rekhraj Meena S/o Shri Balu Ram Meena, Aged About 33
Years, R/o Village Suratpura, Tehsil Lalshot, District Dausa
(Raj.) Belt No. 2689
19. Harendra Tholiya S/o Shri Vijay Tholiya, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Khokhari, Tehsil Ladnun, District Didwana -
Kuchaman (Raj.) Belt No. 1645
20. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balbeer Singh, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Sakatpura Bhawad, Tehsil Mundawar, District
Khairthal Tijara (Raj.) Belt No. 1955
21. Deva Ram S/o Shri Bhiram Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Village Devgarh, Tehsil Riyan Badi, District Nagaur (Raj.) Belt
No. 2611
22. Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Heera Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
Village Sinodiya, Tehisl Roopangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.) Belt
No. 2722
23. Savitri D/o Shri Lekhu Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village
Thikariya, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.) Belt No.
2636
24. Manju Kumari D/o Hukum Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o
Village Madapura, Tehsil Roopwas, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
Belt No. 2739
25. Suman Sharma D/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad Sharma, Aged
About 29 Years, R/o Village Sadara, Tehsil Sawar, District
Ajmer (Raj.) Belt No. 2734
26. Chanchal Regar D/o Shri Likhma Ram, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o Village Thanwala, Tehsil Riyan Badi, District Nagaur
(Downloaded on 22/10/2024 at 09:54:00 PM)
[2024:RJ-JD:43257] (3 of 4) [CW-16949/2024]
27. Pinku Meena D/o Shri Gordhan Lal Meena, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Village Purohito Ka Bas, Post Kali Pahadi, District
Dausa (Raj.) Belt No. 2778
28. Onkar Mal S/o Shri Kishan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village
Singhana, District Didwana - Kuchaman (Raj.) Belt No. 2318
29. Subhash Chandra S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 33
Years, R/o Village Deenwa Ladkhani, Tehsil Fatehpur, District
Sikar (Raj.) Belt No. 2025
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of
Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi,
Jaipur (Raj.).
3. Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer Range, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
4. Superintendent Of Police, Ajmer, District Ajmer (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. O.P. Choudhary.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
22/10/2024
1. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that the
issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the
judgment in Dara Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B.Civil
Writ Petition No.11973/2012, decided on 17.12.2012.
2. In the case of Dara Singh (supra), a coordinate Bench of this
Court, inter alia, directed as under:
"Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that realizing the mistake, appointment has been given, thus, grievance of petitioner to the extent is redressed, but appointment should have been
[2024:RJ-JD:43257] (4 of 4) [CW-16949/2024]
made effective from the date candidates lesser in merit were given appointment with notional benefits.
In view of the prayer made and taking note of the order dated 13.12.2012 whereby petitioner is given appointment realizing mistake by the respondents, I consider it proper to direct that aforesaid appointment should be treated from the date when lesser meritorious candidates were given. The petitioner would, accordingly, be entitled to the notional benefits and seniority from the date persons with less merit were given appointment. The actual benefits would be allowed from the date of joining pursuant to the order dated 13.12.2012. With the aforesaid, writ petition stands disposed of."
3. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioners may
be permitted to file a detailed representation before the
competent authorities for redressal of their grievances.
4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of
with liberty to the petitioners to file a representation to the
competent authorities of the department and the competent
authorities of the department are directed to decide the same
within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such
representation, keeping in mind the law laid down by this Court in
the case of Dara Singh (supra).
5. The order has been passed based on the submissions made
in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the
veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case
the averments made therein are found to be correct, the
petitioners would be entitled to the relief.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 72-Anil Singh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!