Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9102 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:42406]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6253/2024
Manohar Lal S/o Hari Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Bharte Ki
Beri, Khari, Tehsil Dhorimana, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghunath Bishnoi.
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sonu Manawat, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
17/10/2024
1. Under challenge before this Court is an order dated
21.08.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge of NDPS Act
Cases, Barmer in Criminal Misc. Case No.87/2024, arising out of
FIR No.331/2024, lodged at P.S. Kotwali, District Barmer, for the
offences under Sections 8/15 and 25 of NDPS Act, wherein 3 kg
poppy husk (below commercial quantity) was recovered. Vide
impugned order, release of the vehicle in question (Motorcycle) on
Superdari bearing registration No.RJ-04-SW-4404 has been
declined.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is the
owner of the vehicle in question and the contraband recovered is
below commercial quantity. Same has been seized by the Police
Officers. Petitioner being the owner of the vehicle is best entitled
to get it back on Superdari.
[2024:RJ-JD:42406] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6253/2024]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the instant criminal Misc.
petition on the ground that vehicle is a case property.
4. Vehicle was impounded on 03.06.2024 and ever-since parked
in police custody and needless to say it is deteriorating by each
passing day and would turn into a complete junk by the time trial
is concluded.
5. Reference may be had to the judgment rendered by Hon'ble
the Supreme Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai
Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in AIR 2003 SC 638 and the order
dated 18.11.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Criminal Appeal No.2005/2022 [SLP (Crl.) No.7280/2022) titled as
Sainaba Vs. The State of Kerala & Anr., wherein, the vehicle
involved in a crime under NDPS Act was directed to be released on
terms and conditions to be determined by the Special Court. In
view thereof, the instant Petition is also allowed. Adopting the
same reasoning as assigned in the judgment, ibid, this Court
deems it just and appropriate to release the vehicle in question in
favour of the petitioner on interim custody till conclusion of the
trial provided he furnishes a Supurdarinama and surety of like
amount to the satisfaction of the Court below. It is expected of the
learned trial Court to verify the ownership documents of the
vehicle in question before releasing the same on Supurdarinama in
favour of the owner.
(ARUN MONGA),J 23-/Jitender//-
Whether fit for reporting - yes / No. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!