Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8944 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:41696]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2772/2015
Ratan Verma D/o Late Shri Ramvilas Soni, aged 55 years,
resident of B-1, Malva Colony, Behind Darpan Talkies, Pratapgarh
District Pratapgarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Intergrated Child
Development Department, Government of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Woman and Child Development Department,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Dy. Director (Admn.) Woman and Child Development
Department, Jalpath Gandhi Nagar, jaipur.
4. Dy. Director, Woman and Child Development Department,
Pratapgarh.
5. Programme Officer, Woman and Child Development
Department, Pratapgarh.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2774/2015
Smt. Nisha Munshi D/o Late Shri Balkishan, aged 55 years,
resident of Shahpura, Tehsil Shahpura District Bhilwara.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Integrated Child
Development Department, Government of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Woman and Child Development Department,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Dy. Director (Admn.), Woman and Child Development
Department, Jalpath Gandhik Nagar, Jaipur.
4. Dy. Director, Woman and Child Development Department,
Bhilwara.
5. Programme Officer, Woman and Child Development
Department, Shahpura District Bhilwara.
----Respondent
(Downloaded on 15/10/2024 at 09:36:30 PM)
[2024:RJ-JD:41696] (2 of 3) [CW-2772/2015]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gopal Acharya
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Piyush Bhandari
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
10/10/2024
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that controversy
involved in the present case is squarely covered by a judgment
dated 05.03.2010 of this Court at Jaipur Bench rendered in a
batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.2156/2007 (Smt. Manju Rani Nadheria & Ors. vs. State
of Rajasthan & Ors.).
2. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioners may
be permitted to file a detailed representation before the
competent authorities for redressal of their grievances.
3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of
with liberty to the petitioners to file a representation to the
competent authorities of the department and the competent
authorities of the department are directed to decide the same
within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such
representation; and if the case of the petitioner falls within the
purview of the law laid down by this Court in the case of Smt.
Manju Rani Nadheria (supra); the same shall be decided in
terms of the judgment above.
4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made
in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the
veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case
[2024:RJ-JD:41696] (3 of 3) [CW-2772/2015]
the averments made therein are found to be correct, the
petitioners would be entitled to the relief sought.
(FARJAND ALI),J 92-93 divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!