Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ritika vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:41627)
2024 Latest Caselaw 8940 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8940 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ritika vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:41627) on 10 October, 2024

[2024:RJ-JD:41627]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6934/2024

Ritika D/o Shri Umesh Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o House
No. A-44, Street No. 15, A-Block, Burari Baba Colony, North
Delhi.
                                                                           ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                         ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Bharat Singh Rathore.
For Respondent(s)              :     Ms. Sonu Manawat, PP.



               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Order

10/10/2024

1. Under challenge before this Court is an order dated

26.09.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases,

District Sirohi in Criminal Misc. Case No.601/2024 (CIS

No.601/2024), arising out of FIR No.192/2024, lodged at P.S.

Sheoganj, District Sirohi, for the offences under Section 8/15 of

NDPS Act, wherein 314kg poppy husk was recovered. Vide

impugned order, release of the vehicle in question (Creta Car) on

Superdari bearing registration No.DL-8C-BG-7686 has been

declined.

2. Briefly, the relevant facts as pleaded in the petition are that

the petitioner submitted an application under Section 457 Cr.P.C.

before the Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Sirohi, stating that her

vehicle, a Creta car (No. DL-8C BG-7686), was seized in

connection with FIR No. 192/2024 at Police Station Sheoganj,

District Sirohi, for an offence under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act

[2024:RJ-JD:41627] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6934/2024]

on 19.08.2024. The petitioner is the registered owner of the said

vehicle.

2.1. The vehicle was stolen from Delhi on 18.07.2024, for which

the petitioner lodged an FIR at Police Station Burari, North Delhi,

with CR No. 021031 dated 19.07.2024. After the theft, unknown

individuals changed the number plates of the vehicle and used it

for smuggling, leading to its seizure by Police Station Sheoganj in

the NDPS case. Being the registered owner, the petitioner requests

that the vehicle be handed over to her on Superdari.

2.2. In support of her application, the petitioner submitted copies

of the FIR from Police Station Burari, the RC of the vehicle, the

insurance policy, her ID card, PAN card, and employment card.

She has applied for the release of the vehicle (No. DL-8C BG-

7686) on Superdari as the registered owner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she is the

rightful owner of the vehicle in question, which was stolen and had

its number plates changed by unknown individuals. The petitioner

had already lodged an FIR regarding the theft at Police Station

Burari, North Delhi. The vehicle was subsequently seized by the

police officers. Since the petitioner is the original and registered

owner of the vehicle, she is entitled to have it returned to her on

Superdari.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the instant criminal Misc.

petition on the ground that vehicle is a case property.

5. Vehicle was impounded on 19.08.2024 and ever-since parked

in police custody and needless to say it is deteriorating by each

passing day and would turn into a complete junk by the time trial

is concluded.

[2024:RJ-JD:41627] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6934/2024]

6. Reference may be had to the judgment rendered by Hon'ble

the Supreme Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai

Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in AIR 2003 SC 638 and the order

dated 18.11.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

Criminal Appeal No.2005/2022 [SLP (Crl.) No.7280/2022) titled as

Sainaba Vs. The State of Kerala & Anr., wherein, the vehicle

involved in a crime under NDPS Act was directed to be released on

terms and conditions to be determined by the Special Court. In

view thereof, the instant Petition is also allowed. Adopting the

same reasoning as assigned in the judgment, ibid, this Court

deems it just and appropriate to release the vehicle in question in

favour of the petitioner on interim custody till conclusion of the

trial provided she furnishes a Supurdarinama and surety of like

amount to the satisfaction of the Court below. It is expected of the

learned trial Court to verify the ownership documents of the

vehicle in question before releasing the same on Supurdarinama in

favour of the owner after obtaining an appropriate report from

Police Station Burari, North Delhi where the petitioner had lodged

an FIR for theft of her vehicle.

(ARUN MONGA),J 49-/Jitender//-

                                   Whether fit for reporting -   yes   /    No.









Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter