Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Garv Choudhary Son Of Shri Rakesh ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:43962)
2024 Latest Caselaw 6342 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6342 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Garv Choudhary Son Of Shri Rakesh ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:43962) on 19 October, 2024

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2024:RJ-JP:43962]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

        S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6957/2024

Garv Choudhary Son Of Shri Rakesh Choudhary, Aged About 20
Years, Resident Of 2-J-15,16 Kala Kaun Housing Board, District
Alwar, Rajasthan.
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2.       Sachin Kumar Son Of Shri Hetram Meena, Aged About 22
         Years, Resident Of Behind Balaji Hotel, Bhugor Bypass,
         Sadar Alwar, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP For Complainant : Mr. Rohit

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

19/10/2024

1. This petition under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is filed, with a

prayer to quash the FIR No.115/2022 registered at Police Station

Aravali Vihar, District Alwar for offences under Sections 323, 341,

504, 427, 506 & 143 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r) & 3(2)(va) of

SC/ST Act, on the basis of compromise effectuated between the

parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute.

2. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the

dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been

resolved by the parties amicably.

3. Heard and considered.

[2024:RJ-JP:43962] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6957/2024]

4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place

reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in

Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and

Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in

[2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced

below:

"12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non- compoundable."

5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex

Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature

of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this

Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition.

Compromise is taken on record.

6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal

miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No.115/2022

registered at Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar with all

consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside.

7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending

application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

JKP/38

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter