Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 306 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2024
[2024:RJ-JP:2820-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil (PIL) Writ Petition No.14419/2015
1. Dilip Singh son of Shri Mangal Singh aged about 48 years,
Resident of Guman Singh Darwaje Ke Pass, Kishangarh District
Ajmer. Mobile No.9214074964
2. Sunil Son of Shri Om Prakash, aged about 38 years, resident
of Near Thakurdas Mandir Ward No.33 (at present Ward No.35),
Kishangarh District Ajmer
Mobile No.9636235933
3. Nasir Ahmed s/o Chand ji aged about 54 years, resident of
Majhviyon Ka Mohalla Kishangarh District Ajmer. Mobile
No.9829940461
4. Trilok Saini son of Shri Bheru Lal aged about 40 years resident
of Maliyon Ka Mohalla, Kishangarh District Ajmer Mobile
No.9269037038
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through the Chief Secretary, Government
of Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government
of Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur.
3. The Principal Secretary, Department of P.W.D., Government of
Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur.
4. The Principal Secretary, Department of Local Bodies,
Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
5. District Collector, Ajmer.
6. Tehsildar, Kishangarh, District Ajmer
7. Municipal Council, Kishangarh through its Commissioner,
Kishangarh, District Ajmer
8. Assistant Engineer, Public Work Department Near Bus Stand,
Kishangarh, District Ajmer
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vimal Choudhary, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.K. Sharma, Advocate
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
17/01/2024
This PIL has been filed on the allegation that land comprised
in Khasra Nos.309 and 310 which is gair mumkin rasta has been
encroached.
[2024:RJ-JP:2820-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-14419/2015]
In the reply filed by the respondents, what is revealed is that
when the road was being constructed on Khasra No.332 and 334,
the occupants/holders of those land filed civil suit and the Civil
Court passed various orders. The issue pending therein is as to
whether road exists on Khasra Nos.309 and 310 or road is
comprised in Khasra Nos.332 and 334.
We also find that as far as official respondents are
concerned, they have placed on record certain documents which
includes spot inspection report which indicates that land
comprised in Khasra Nos.309 and 310 is recorded as gair mumkin
rasta which has been encroached.
Instead of keeping this petition pending, it is proper to
dispose off this PIL with a direction to the District Collector, Ajmer
to verify from the record and if necessary, by an inquiry of factual
nature, to ascertain the location of the gair mumkin rasta which is
said to be comprised in Khasra Nos.309 & 310. Thereafter,
appropriate action is required to be taken to ensure that
encroachment on gair mumkin rasta on those khasra numbers if is
still continuing, be removed.
However, in case, in the pending suit, any judgment or any
finding is recorded otherwise, the respondent-authority shall be
free to approach this Court for appropriate recall or modification.
The PIL is accordingly disposed off.
The security amount deposited by the petitioners shall be
refunded.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Karan/38
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!